Secondary students’ evaluation of inappropriate strategies of reasoning about evidence under a scientific explanation

Guanzhong Ma, Carol Chan, Jan van Aalst, Jing Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study explored potential factors that could affect the development of students’ strategies for evaluating scientific evidence. Thirty-six students from Grade 7 were asked to evaluate the evidence from an investigation involving force and motion. They were shown three inappropriate responses to reasoning about that evidence. They were then asked to evaluate these responses against an informational text that conveyed the scientific explanation with Galileo’s thought experiment. Participants’ verbal responses to reasoning about the inappropriate responses to the informational text were transcribed and analysed qualitatively. We found three factors that influenced strategy development: the students 1) kept the conflict between the competing claims of the domain unresolved, 2) doubted the validity of the inference from the thought experiment and 3) mistakenly assessed the plausibility of the competing claims. Implications for explaining the development of reasoning about scientific evidence and for instruction are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-183
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS
Volume1
Issue numberJune
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018
Event13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2018: Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count - UCL Institute of Education, London, United Kingdom
Duration: 23 Jun 201827 Jun 2018
Conference number: 13
https://www.isls.org/icls/2018/icls2018.com/index.html

Fingerprint

Students
evaluation
evidence
student
experiment
Experiments
development strategy
school grade
instruction

Cite this

@article{d2aa4b83b66741b3b2c91fdbd4a727dc,
title = "Secondary students’ evaluation of inappropriate strategies of reasoning about evidence under a scientific explanation",
abstract = "This study explored potential factors that could affect the development of students’ strategies for evaluating scientific evidence. Thirty-six students from Grade 7 were asked to evaluate the evidence from an investigation involving force and motion. They were shown three inappropriate responses to reasoning about that evidence. They were then asked to evaluate these responses against an informational text that conveyed the scientific explanation with Galileo’s thought experiment. Participants’ verbal responses to reasoning about the inappropriate responses to the informational text were transcribed and analysed qualitatively. We found three factors that influenced strategy development: the students 1) kept the conflict between the competing claims of the domain unresolved, 2) doubted the validity of the inference from the thought experiment and 3) mistakenly assessed the plausibility of the competing claims. Implications for explaining the development of reasoning about scientific evidence and for instruction are discussed.",
author = "Guanzhong Ma and Carol Chan and {van Aalst}, Jan and Jing Wang",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "176--183",
journal = "Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS",
issn = "1814-9316",
publisher = "International Society of the Learning Sciences",
number = "June",

}

Secondary students’ evaluation of inappropriate strategies of reasoning about evidence under a scientific explanation. / Ma, Guanzhong; Chan, Carol; van Aalst, Jan; Wang, Jing.

In: Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS, Vol. 1, No. June, 01.01.2018, p. 176-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secondary students’ evaluation of inappropriate strategies of reasoning about evidence under a scientific explanation

AU - Ma, Guanzhong

AU - Chan, Carol

AU - van Aalst, Jan

AU - Wang, Jing

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This study explored potential factors that could affect the development of students’ strategies for evaluating scientific evidence. Thirty-six students from Grade 7 were asked to evaluate the evidence from an investigation involving force and motion. They were shown three inappropriate responses to reasoning about that evidence. They were then asked to evaluate these responses against an informational text that conveyed the scientific explanation with Galileo’s thought experiment. Participants’ verbal responses to reasoning about the inappropriate responses to the informational text were transcribed and analysed qualitatively. We found three factors that influenced strategy development: the students 1) kept the conflict between the competing claims of the domain unresolved, 2) doubted the validity of the inference from the thought experiment and 3) mistakenly assessed the plausibility of the competing claims. Implications for explaining the development of reasoning about scientific evidence and for instruction are discussed.

AB - This study explored potential factors that could affect the development of students’ strategies for evaluating scientific evidence. Thirty-six students from Grade 7 were asked to evaluate the evidence from an investigation involving force and motion. They were shown three inappropriate responses to reasoning about that evidence. They were then asked to evaluate these responses against an informational text that conveyed the scientific explanation with Galileo’s thought experiment. Participants’ verbal responses to reasoning about the inappropriate responses to the informational text were transcribed and analysed qualitatively. We found three factors that influenced strategy development: the students 1) kept the conflict between the competing claims of the domain unresolved, 2) doubted the validity of the inference from the thought experiment and 3) mistakenly assessed the plausibility of the competing claims. Implications for explaining the development of reasoning about scientific evidence and for instruction are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053912327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference article

VL - 1

SP - 176

EP - 183

JO - Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS

JF - Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences, ICLS

SN - 1814-9316

IS - June

ER -