Selecting and switching: some advantages of diagrams for presenting instructions

A.W.B.M. Boekelder, A. Boekelder, M.F. Steehouder

  • 11 Citations

Abstract

Instructions for operating a control panel were presented in five different formats: flowchart, logical tree, yes/no tree, decision table, and list. Subjects had to choose one out of eight buttons, depending on the settings of the control panel. The results show that the decision table resulted in more errors, and that both the decision table and the list took longer than the three other formats, which did not show mutual differences. It turned out that the subjects valued most the format they had been using, except for those who had worked with the list. It is suggested that the users' ease of orientation for a diagram's format, both during reading and after “switching” between equipment and instructional text, explains the differences between the formats
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)229-241
Number of pages13
JournalIEEE transactions on professional communication
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Decision tables
Diagrams

Keywords

  • METIS-148679
  • IR-73573

Cite this

Boekelder, A.W.B.M.; Boekelder, A.; Steehouder, M.F. / Selecting and switching: some advantages of diagrams for presenting instructions.

In: IEEE transactions on professional communication, Vol. 41, No. 4, 1998, p. 229-241.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

@article{3e5bc7a59b8c4f149566da9b276122f9,
title = "Selecting and switching: some advantages of diagrams for presenting instructions",
abstract = "Instructions for operating a control panel were presented in five different formats: flowchart, logical tree, yes/no tree, decision table, and list. Subjects had to choose one out of eight buttons, depending on the settings of the control panel. The results show that the decision table resulted in more errors, and that both the decision table and the list took longer than the three other formats, which did not show mutual differences. It turned out that the subjects valued most the format they had been using, except for those who had worked with the list. It is suggested that the users' ease of orientation for a diagram's format, both during reading and after “switching” between equipment and instructional text, explains the differences between the formats",
keywords = "METIS-148679, IR-73573",
author = "A.W.B.M. Boekelder and A. Boekelder and M.F. Steehouder",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1109/47.735365",
volume = "41",
pages = "229--241",
journal = "IEEE transactions on professional communication",
issn = "0361-1434",
publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Selecting and switching: some advantages of diagrams for presenting instructions. / Boekelder, A.W.B.M.; Boekelder, A.; Steehouder, M.F.

In: IEEE transactions on professional communication, Vol. 41, No. 4, 1998, p. 229-241.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selecting and switching: some advantages of diagrams for presenting instructions

AU - Boekelder,A.W.B.M.

AU - Boekelder,A.

AU - Steehouder,M.F.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Instructions for operating a control panel were presented in five different formats: flowchart, logical tree, yes/no tree, decision table, and list. Subjects had to choose one out of eight buttons, depending on the settings of the control panel. The results show that the decision table resulted in more errors, and that both the decision table and the list took longer than the three other formats, which did not show mutual differences. It turned out that the subjects valued most the format they had been using, except for those who had worked with the list. It is suggested that the users' ease of orientation for a diagram's format, both during reading and after “switching” between equipment and instructional text, explains the differences between the formats

AB - Instructions for operating a control panel were presented in five different formats: flowchart, logical tree, yes/no tree, decision table, and list. Subjects had to choose one out of eight buttons, depending on the settings of the control panel. The results show that the decision table resulted in more errors, and that both the decision table and the list took longer than the three other formats, which did not show mutual differences. It turned out that the subjects valued most the format they had been using, except for those who had worked with the list. It is suggested that the users' ease of orientation for a diagram's format, both during reading and after “switching” between equipment and instructional text, explains the differences between the formats

KW - METIS-148679

KW - IR-73573

U2 - 10.1109/47.735365

DO - 10.1109/47.735365

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 229

EP - 241

JO - IEEE transactions on professional communication

T2 - IEEE transactions on professional communication

JF - IEEE transactions on professional communication

SN - 0361-1434

IS - 4

ER -