Selecting indicators for international benchmarking of radiotherapy centres

W.A.M. van Lent, R. D. de Beer, B. van Triest, Willem H. van Harten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Benchmarking can be used to improve hospital performance. It is however not easy to develop a concise and meaningful set of indicators on aspects related to operations management. We developed an indicator set for managers and evaluated its use in an international benchmark of radiotherapy centres. The indicator set assessed the efficiency, patient-centeredness and timeliness of the services delivered. Methods: We identified possible indicators from literature and professionals. Stakeholders’ feedback helped to produce a shortlist of indicators. For this indicator set, data were obtained in a pilot that included four European radiotherapy centres. With these data, the indicators were evaluated on definition clarity, data availability, reliability and discriminative value. Results: Literature produced a gross list of 81 indicators. Based on stakeholder feedback, 33 indicators were selected and evaluated in the benchmark. Six negatively evaluated indicators were adapted, together with eight positively evaluated indicators 14 indicators seemed feasible. Examples of indicators concerned utilisation, waiting times, patient satisfaction and risk analysis. Conclusions: This study provides a pragmatic indicator development process for international benchmarks on operations management. The presented indicators showed to be feasible for use in international benchmarking of radiotherapy centres. The pilot identified attainable performance levels and provided leads for improvements
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)26-38
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of radiotherapy in practice
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Feb 2013

Keywords

  • IR-80863
  • METIS-287072

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Selecting indicators for international benchmarking of radiotherapy centres'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this