Selection of a portfolio of R&D projects

Sébastien Casault, Aard J. Groen, Jonathan D. Linton

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While portfolios of research are increasingly discussed, a portfolio perspective is infrequently taken when selecting two or more projects. Consequently, this chapter considers the current state of knowledge in project and portfolio selection, identifies why we can and cannot apply knowledge from the highly developed field of financial portfolio management, and finally consideration is given to what still needs to be done in this field. Perhaps more troubling is the fact that many R&D managers cannot appreciably perceive improved decisions in terms of project selection when using best practices as described in the management literature (Chien, 2002). This is a challenge but also an opportunity to provide managers with tools that lead to better decisions in practice. Decision makers currently have several tools that can be used to rank projects and to assign relative importance weights to individual projects. Projects are typically measured individually based on merit, with little or no consideration of greater strategic goals or their impact on other projects being considered for approval. For example, it is common for decision makers to approve several research projects that make use of a single methodology in a narrow area of science based on merit alone – placing several bets in a specific research methodology
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation (Chapter 4)
EditorsAlbert N. Link, Nicholas S. Vonortas
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Pages89-111
Number of pages424
ISBN (Print)9780857932396
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Project selection
Managers
Decision maker
Portfolio management
Relative importance
Methodology
Placing
Portfolio selection
Best practice
Strategic goals

Cite this

Casault, S., Groen, A. J., & Linton, J. D. (2013). Selection of a portfolio of R&D projects. In A. N. Link, & N. S. Vonortas (Eds.), Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation (Chapter 4) (pp. 89-111). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932402
Casault, Sébastien ; Groen, Aard J. ; Linton, Jonathan D. / Selection of a portfolio of R&D projects. Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation (Chapter 4). editor / Albert N. Link ; Nicholas S. Vonortas. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013. pp. 89-111
@inbook{fc1b9d77d503478698e575dbe7d482f6,
title = "Selection of a portfolio of R&D projects",
abstract = "While portfolios of research are increasingly discussed, a portfolio perspective is infrequently taken when selecting two or more projects. Consequently, this chapter considers the current state of knowledge in project and portfolio selection, identifies why we can and cannot apply knowledge from the highly developed field of financial portfolio management, and finally consideration is given to what still needs to be done in this field. Perhaps more troubling is the fact that many R&D managers cannot appreciably perceive improved decisions in terms of project selection when using best practices as described in the management literature (Chien, 2002). This is a challenge but also an opportunity to provide managers with tools that lead to better decisions in practice. Decision makers currently have several tools that can be used to rank projects and to assign relative importance weights to individual projects. Projects are typically measured individually based on merit, with little or no consideration of greater strategic goals or their impact on other projects being considered for approval. For example, it is common for decision makers to approve several research projects that make use of a single methodology in a narrow area of science based on merit alone – placing several bets in a specific research methodology",
author = "S{\'e}bastien Casault and Groen, {Aard J.} and Linton, {Jonathan D.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.4337/9780857932402",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780857932396",
pages = "89--111",
editor = "Link, {Albert N.} and Vonortas, {Nicholas S.}",
booktitle = "Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation (Chapter 4)",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",

}

Casault, S, Groen, AJ & Linton, JD 2013, Selection of a portfolio of R&D projects. in AN Link & NS Vonortas (eds), Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation (Chapter 4). Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 89-111. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932402

Selection of a portfolio of R&D projects. / Casault, Sébastien; Groen, Aard J.; Linton, Jonathan D.

Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation (Chapter 4). ed. / Albert N. Link; Nicholas S. Vonortas. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013. p. 89-111.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Selection of a portfolio of R&D projects

AU - Casault, Sébastien

AU - Groen, Aard J.

AU - Linton, Jonathan D.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - While portfolios of research are increasingly discussed, a portfolio perspective is infrequently taken when selecting two or more projects. Consequently, this chapter considers the current state of knowledge in project and portfolio selection, identifies why we can and cannot apply knowledge from the highly developed field of financial portfolio management, and finally consideration is given to what still needs to be done in this field. Perhaps more troubling is the fact that many R&D managers cannot appreciably perceive improved decisions in terms of project selection when using best practices as described in the management literature (Chien, 2002). This is a challenge but also an opportunity to provide managers with tools that lead to better decisions in practice. Decision makers currently have several tools that can be used to rank projects and to assign relative importance weights to individual projects. Projects are typically measured individually based on merit, with little or no consideration of greater strategic goals or their impact on other projects being considered for approval. For example, it is common for decision makers to approve several research projects that make use of a single methodology in a narrow area of science based on merit alone – placing several bets in a specific research methodology

AB - While portfolios of research are increasingly discussed, a portfolio perspective is infrequently taken when selecting two or more projects. Consequently, this chapter considers the current state of knowledge in project and portfolio selection, identifies why we can and cannot apply knowledge from the highly developed field of financial portfolio management, and finally consideration is given to what still needs to be done in this field. Perhaps more troubling is the fact that many R&D managers cannot appreciably perceive improved decisions in terms of project selection when using best practices as described in the management literature (Chien, 2002). This is a challenge but also an opportunity to provide managers with tools that lead to better decisions in practice. Decision makers currently have several tools that can be used to rank projects and to assign relative importance weights to individual projects. Projects are typically measured individually based on merit, with little or no consideration of greater strategic goals or their impact on other projects being considered for approval. For example, it is common for decision makers to approve several research projects that make use of a single methodology in a narrow area of science based on merit alone – placing several bets in a specific research methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881772568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4337/9780857932402

DO - 10.4337/9780857932402

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780857932396

SP - 89

EP - 111

BT - Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation (Chapter 4)

A2 - Link, Albert N.

A2 - Vonortas, Nicholas S.

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

ER -

Casault S, Groen AJ, Linton JD. Selection of a portfolio of R&D projects. In Link AN, Vonortas NS, editors, Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation (Chapter 4). Edward Elgar Publishing. 2013. p. 89-111 https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857932402