TY - JOUR
T1 - Selectivity Versus Noise Trade-Offs in Resistively Driven Passive Switched-Capacitor Infinite Impulse Response Low-Pass Filters
AU - Plompen, Roel
AU - Ponte, Jeroen
AU - van Zanten, Stef
AU - Klumperink, Eric A.M.
AU - Nauta, Bram
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2004-2012 IEEE.
Financial transaction number:
2500173593
PY - 2025/1/23
Y1 - 2025/1/23
N2 - In this article, we derive a practical limit on the maximum achievable selectivity of three commonly used Passive Switched-Capacitor (PSC) Infinite-Impulse Response (IIR) low-pass filter (LPF) topologies driven from a resistive source. We show that filter topology selection and component dimensioning aimed to improve the selectivity of these filters will necessarily degrade the Noise Figure (NF), revealing a selectivity versus NF trade-off. We subsequently capture this in selectivity versus NF graphs. These graphs quantify the limitations on achievable selectivity and NF for each topology given the number of filter poles, and graphically provide guidance in navigating the trade-off between them. The three considered topologies mainly differ in how the sampling capacitor resets, inverts, or holds its voltage between clock periods. We capture the handling of the sampling capacitor as a new design parameter. We derive a singular model to encompass the entire design space consisting of the three topologies, filter order (number of history/integration capacitors), clock frequency, and component dimensions. The model comprises an adjoint network with a state-space description and is used to analyze the filter transfer function (to quantify selectivity), input-and output-referred noise, and NF.
AB - In this article, we derive a practical limit on the maximum achievable selectivity of three commonly used Passive Switched-Capacitor (PSC) Infinite-Impulse Response (IIR) low-pass filter (LPF) topologies driven from a resistive source. We show that filter topology selection and component dimensioning aimed to improve the selectivity of these filters will necessarily degrade the Noise Figure (NF), revealing a selectivity versus NF trade-off. We subsequently capture this in selectivity versus NF graphs. These graphs quantify the limitations on achievable selectivity and NF for each topology given the number of filter poles, and graphically provide guidance in navigating the trade-off between them. The three considered topologies mainly differ in how the sampling capacitor resets, inverts, or holds its voltage between clock periods. We capture the handling of the sampling capacitor as a new design parameter. We derive a singular model to encompass the entire design space consisting of the three topologies, filter order (number of history/integration capacitors), clock frequency, and component dimensions. The model comprises an adjoint network with a state-space description and is used to analyze the filter transfer function (to quantify selectivity), input-and output-referred noise, and NF.
KW - Adjoint network
KW - Analysis
KW - Charge rotating
KW - Design strategy
KW - Infinite impulse response (IIR)
KW - Low noise
KW - Low-Pass Filter (LPF)
KW - Passive
KW - Selectivity
KW - State space
KW - Switched capacitor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216074615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TCSI.2025.3531706
DO - 10.1109/TCSI.2025.3531706
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85216074615
SN - 1549-8328
JO - IEEE transactions on circuits and systems I: regular papers
JF - IEEE transactions on circuits and systems I: regular papers
ER -