Self-Control, Accidents, and Crime

Marianne Junger, Richard E. Tremblay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to self-control theory, crime and accident involvement are positively related. Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) argued that this relation is spurious and results from the fact that both accidents and crime are the result of a lack of self-control. In particular, they argued that a positive relation is supportive of their theory and cannot be explained by competing theories, such as strain or cultural deviance theory. This study explored two questions: (a) Is there a relation between crime and accidents? (b) Is there support for the spuriousness thesis, that is, can the relation between crime and accident involvement be accounted for by a measure of self-control or by a measure of social control? The answer to both questions was largely affirmative. There was a relatively strong positive relation between crime and accidents, with delinquents more involved than nondelinquents in accidents. The analysis also showed that, although measures of self-control and social control were related to delinquency and to accident involvement, the relation between crime and accidents became weaker when these measures were taken into account, but it did not disappear. Thus, the spuriousness thesis was partially supported
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)485-501
JournalCriminal justice and behavior
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Keywords

  • IR-95365

Cite this

Junger, Marianne ; Tremblay, Richard E. / Self-Control, Accidents, and Crime. In: Criminal justice and behavior. 1999 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 485-501.
@article{e2982b6cf1af4e8692f3b67e0125fcc2,
title = "Self-Control, Accidents, and Crime",
abstract = "According to self-control theory, crime and accident involvement are positively related. Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) argued that this relation is spurious and results from the fact that both accidents and crime are the result of a lack of self-control. In particular, they argued that a positive relation is supportive of their theory and cannot be explained by competing theories, such as strain or cultural deviance theory. This study explored two questions: (a) Is there a relation between crime and accidents? (b) Is there support for the spuriousness thesis, that is, can the relation between crime and accident involvement be accounted for by a measure of self-control or by a measure of social control? The answer to both questions was largely affirmative. There was a relatively strong positive relation between crime and accidents, with delinquents more involved than nondelinquents in accidents. The analysis also showed that, although measures of self-control and social control were related to delinquency and to accident involvement, the relation between crime and accidents became weaker when these measures were taken into account, but it did not disappear. Thus, the spuriousness thesis was partially supported",
keywords = "IR-95365",
author = "Marianne Junger and Tremblay, {Richard E.}",
year = "1999",
doi = "10.1177/0093854899026004005",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "26",
pages = "485--501",
journal = "Criminal justice and behavior",
issn = "0093-8548",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

Self-Control, Accidents, and Crime. / Junger, Marianne; Tremblay, Richard E.

In: Criminal justice and behavior, Vol. 26, No. 4, 1999, p. 485-501.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-Control, Accidents, and Crime

AU - Junger, Marianne

AU - Tremblay, Richard E.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - According to self-control theory, crime and accident involvement are positively related. Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) argued that this relation is spurious and results from the fact that both accidents and crime are the result of a lack of self-control. In particular, they argued that a positive relation is supportive of their theory and cannot be explained by competing theories, such as strain or cultural deviance theory. This study explored two questions: (a) Is there a relation between crime and accidents? (b) Is there support for the spuriousness thesis, that is, can the relation between crime and accident involvement be accounted for by a measure of self-control or by a measure of social control? The answer to both questions was largely affirmative. There was a relatively strong positive relation between crime and accidents, with delinquents more involved than nondelinquents in accidents. The analysis also showed that, although measures of self-control and social control were related to delinquency and to accident involvement, the relation between crime and accidents became weaker when these measures were taken into account, but it did not disappear. Thus, the spuriousness thesis was partially supported

AB - According to self-control theory, crime and accident involvement are positively related. Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) argued that this relation is spurious and results from the fact that both accidents and crime are the result of a lack of self-control. In particular, they argued that a positive relation is supportive of their theory and cannot be explained by competing theories, such as strain or cultural deviance theory. This study explored two questions: (a) Is there a relation between crime and accidents? (b) Is there support for the spuriousness thesis, that is, can the relation between crime and accident involvement be accounted for by a measure of self-control or by a measure of social control? The answer to both questions was largely affirmative. There was a relatively strong positive relation between crime and accidents, with delinquents more involved than nondelinquents in accidents. The analysis also showed that, although measures of self-control and social control were related to delinquency and to accident involvement, the relation between crime and accidents became weaker when these measures were taken into account, but it did not disappear. Thus, the spuriousness thesis was partially supported

KW - IR-95365

U2 - 10.1177/0093854899026004005

DO - 10.1177/0093854899026004005

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 485

EP - 501

JO - Criminal justice and behavior

JF - Criminal justice and behavior

SN - 0093-8548

IS - 4

ER -