Semantics of trace relations in requirements models for consistency checking and inferencing

Arda Göknil, Ivan Ivanov, Klaas van den Berg, Jan-Willem Veldhuis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

49 Citations (Scopus)
60 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Requirements traceability is the ability to relate requirements back to stakeholders and forward to corresponding design artifacts, code, and test cases. Although considerable research has been devoted to relating requirements in both forward and backward directions, less attention has been paid to relating requirements with other requirements. Relations between requirements influence a number of activities during software development such as consistency checking and change management. In most approaches and tools, there is a lack of precise definition of requirements relations. In this respect, deficient results may be produced. In this paper, we aim at formal definitions of the relation types in order to enable reasoning about requirements relations. We give a requirements metamodel with commonly used relation types. The semantics of the relations is provided with a formalization in first-order logic. We use the formalization for consistency checking of relations and for inferring new relations. A tool has been built to support both reasoning activities. We illustrate our approach in an example which shows that the formal semantics of relation types enables new relations to be inferred and contradicting relations in requirements documents to be determined. The application of requirements reasoning based on formal semantics resolves many of the deficiencies observed in other approaches. Our tool supports better understanding of dependencies between requirements.
Original languageUndefined
Article number10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3
Pages (from-to)31-54
Number of pages24
JournalSoftware and systems modeling
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

Keywords

  • EWI-17036
  • IR-69007
  • METIS-264453

Cite this

Göknil, A., Ivanov, I., van den Berg, K., & Veldhuis, J-W. (2009). Semantics of trace relations in requirements models for consistency checking and inferencing. Software and systems modeling, 10(1), 31-54. [10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3
Göknil, Arda ; Ivanov, Ivan ; van den Berg, Klaas ; Veldhuis, Jan-Willem. / Semantics of trace relations in requirements models for consistency checking and inferencing. In: Software and systems modeling. 2009 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 31-54.
@article{255792c698f24469b94cdc9a5d524b6d,
title = "Semantics of trace relations in requirements models for consistency checking and inferencing",
abstract = "Requirements traceability is the ability to relate requirements back to stakeholders and forward to corresponding design artifacts, code, and test cases. Although considerable research has been devoted to relating requirements in both forward and backward directions, less attention has been paid to relating requirements with other requirements. Relations between requirements influence a number of activities during software development such as consistency checking and change management. In most approaches and tools, there is a lack of precise definition of requirements relations. In this respect, deficient results may be produced. In this paper, we aim at formal definitions of the relation types in order to enable reasoning about requirements relations. We give a requirements metamodel with commonly used relation types. The semantics of the relations is provided with a formalization in first-order logic. We use the formalization for consistency checking of relations and for inferring new relations. A tool has been built to support both reasoning activities. We illustrate our approach in an example which shows that the formal semantics of relation types enables new relations to be inferred and contradicting relations in requirements documents to be determined. The application of requirements reasoning based on formal semantics resolves many of the deficiencies observed in other approaches. Our tool supports better understanding of dependencies between requirements.",
keywords = "EWI-17036, IR-69007, METIS-264453",
author = "Arda G{\"o}knil and Ivan Ivanov and {van den Berg}, Klaas and Jan-Willem Veldhuis",
note = "10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "10",
pages = "31--54",
journal = "Software and systems modeling",
issn = "1619-1366",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

Göknil, A, Ivanov, I, van den Berg, K & Veldhuis, J-W 2009, 'Semantics of trace relations in requirements models for consistency checking and inferencing' Software and systems modeling, vol. 10, no. 1, 10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3, pp. 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3

Semantics of trace relations in requirements models for consistency checking and inferencing. / Göknil, Arda; Ivanov, Ivan; van den Berg, Klaas; Veldhuis, Jan-Willem.

In: Software and systems modeling, Vol. 10, No. 1, 10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3, 12.2009, p. 31-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Semantics of trace relations in requirements models for consistency checking and inferencing

AU - Göknil, Arda

AU - Ivanov, Ivan

AU - van den Berg, Klaas

AU - Veldhuis, Jan-Willem

N1 - 10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Requirements traceability is the ability to relate requirements back to stakeholders and forward to corresponding design artifacts, code, and test cases. Although considerable research has been devoted to relating requirements in both forward and backward directions, less attention has been paid to relating requirements with other requirements. Relations between requirements influence a number of activities during software development such as consistency checking and change management. In most approaches and tools, there is a lack of precise definition of requirements relations. In this respect, deficient results may be produced. In this paper, we aim at formal definitions of the relation types in order to enable reasoning about requirements relations. We give a requirements metamodel with commonly used relation types. The semantics of the relations is provided with a formalization in first-order logic. We use the formalization for consistency checking of relations and for inferring new relations. A tool has been built to support both reasoning activities. We illustrate our approach in an example which shows that the formal semantics of relation types enables new relations to be inferred and contradicting relations in requirements documents to be determined. The application of requirements reasoning based on formal semantics resolves many of the deficiencies observed in other approaches. Our tool supports better understanding of dependencies between requirements.

AB - Requirements traceability is the ability to relate requirements back to stakeholders and forward to corresponding design artifacts, code, and test cases. Although considerable research has been devoted to relating requirements in both forward and backward directions, less attention has been paid to relating requirements with other requirements. Relations between requirements influence a number of activities during software development such as consistency checking and change management. In most approaches and tools, there is a lack of precise definition of requirements relations. In this respect, deficient results may be produced. In this paper, we aim at formal definitions of the relation types in order to enable reasoning about requirements relations. We give a requirements metamodel with commonly used relation types. The semantics of the relations is provided with a formalization in first-order logic. We use the formalization for consistency checking of relations and for inferring new relations. A tool has been built to support both reasoning activities. We illustrate our approach in an example which shows that the formal semantics of relation types enables new relations to be inferred and contradicting relations in requirements documents to be determined. The application of requirements reasoning based on formal semantics resolves many of the deficiencies observed in other approaches. Our tool supports better understanding of dependencies between requirements.

KW - EWI-17036

KW - IR-69007

KW - METIS-264453

U2 - 10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3

DO - 10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 31

EP - 54

JO - Software and systems modeling

JF - Software and systems modeling

SN - 1619-1366

IS - 1

M1 - 10.1007/s10270-009-0142-3

ER -