Sensitivity of radar backscattering to soil surface parameters: A comparison between theoretical analysis and experimental evidence

Rudi Hoeben*, Peter A. Troch, Zhongbo Su, Marco Mancini, Kun Shan Chen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The understanding of the sensitivity of radar backscattering to surface parameters is essential in applying microwave remote sensing to the retrieval of geo- and bio-physical parameters. A theoretical model, the Integral Equation Model, is used to investigate the sensitivity of radar backscattering to soil surface parameters. This model is first tested against a dataset retrieved under well controlled conditions at the European Microwave Signature Laboratory, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy. Then the surface roughness parameters are normalized with respect to wavelength and incidence angle to improve our insight into the sensitivity of radar observations to surface roughness. In this way the roughness space can be subdivided in two regions where surface slope controls the dependency of the signal to roughness.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication IGARSS'97. 1997 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings. Remote Sensing - A Scientific Vision for Sustainable Development
Place of PublicationSingapore
PublisherIEEE
Pages1368-1370
Number of pages3
ISBN (Print)0-7803-3836-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 1997
Externally publishedYes
EventIEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 1997 - Singapore, Singapore
Duration: 3 Aug 19978 Aug 1997

Conference

ConferenceIEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 1997
Abbreviated titleIGARSS 1997
Country/TerritorySingapore
CitySingapore
Period3/08/978/08/97

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity of radar backscattering to soil surface parameters: A comparison between theoretical analysis and experimental evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this