Severe Postictal Confusion After Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Retrospective Study

Objectives Severe postictal confusion (sPIC) is an important but poorly investigated adverse effect of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). In this retrospective study, prevalence of sPIC and potential risk factors were explored. Methods Medical charts of 295 ECT patients (mean ± SD age, 57 ± 15 years; male, 36%) were scrutinized for occurrence of sPIC, as well as demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics. Patients showing sPIC were compared with patients who did not, using univariate statistics. Multivariate analyses with a split-sample validation procedure were used to assess whether predictive models could be developed using independent data sets. Results O 295 patients, 74 (25.1%) showed sPIC. All patients showing sPIC needed extra medication, 9% (n = 7) required physically restraints, and 5% (n = 4) had to be secluded. Univariate analyses showed several trends: patients with sPIC were more often males (P = 0.05), had more often history of cerebrovascular incident (P = 0.02), did not use concomitant selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (P = 0.01), received higher median dosage of succinylcholine (P = 0.02), and received pretreatment with flumazenil more often (P = 0.07), but these associations did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Multiple logistic regression analysis did not result in a model that could predict sPIC in the holdout data set. Conclusions In this retrospective naturalistic study in 295 ECT patients, the prevalence of sPIC appeared to be 25%. Patients showing sPIC were characterized by male sex, history of cerebrovascular incident, use of higher-dose succinylcholine, and pretreatment with flumazenil. However, multivariate analysis revealed no significant model to predict sPIC in independent data.