Should post-publication peer review be anonymous?

Philip Moriarty
, Paul Benneworth

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Popular

131 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The PubPeer organisers and two other scholars debate the merits and pitfalls of anonymity in peer review

Original language	English
Number of pages	7
Journal	Times Higher Education
Publication status	Published - 10 Dec 2015

Keywords

n/a OA procedure

Cite this

@article{ba7f5540ed8940f3a18ee65739cd7147,

title = "Should post-publication peer review be anonymous?",

abstract = "The PubPeer organisers and two other scholars debate the merits and pitfalls of anonymity in peer review",

keywords = "n/a OA procedure",

author = "Philip Moriarty and Paul Benneworth",

year = "2015",

month = dec,

day = "10",

language = "English",

journal = "Times Higher Education",

publisher = "TSL Education Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should post-publication peer review be anonymous?

AU - Moriarty, Philip

AU - Benneworth, Paul

PY - 2015/12/10

Y1 - 2015/12/10

N2 - The PubPeer organisers and two other scholars debate the merits and pitfalls of anonymity in peer review

AB - The PubPeer organisers and two other scholars debate the merits and pitfalls of anonymity in peer review

KW - n/a OA procedure

M3 - Article

JO - Times Higher Education

JF - Times Higher Education

ER -