Abstract
Metaheuristics are found to be efficient in different applications where the use of exact algorithms becomes short-handed. In the last decade, many of these algorithms have been introduced and used in a wide range of applications. Nevertheless, most of those approaches share similar components leading to a concern related to their novelty or contribution. Thus, in this paper, a pool template is proposed and used to categorize algorithm components permitting to analyze them in a structured way. We exemplify its use by means of continuous optimization metaheuristics, and provide some measures and methodology to identify their similarities and novelties. Finally, a discussion at a component level is provided in order to point out possible design differences and commonalities.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 265-287 |
Journal | Natural Computing |
Volume | 21 |
Early online date | 10 Feb 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2022 |
Keywords
- UT-Hybrid-D
- Comparison methodology
- Metaheuristics design
- Pool template
- Metaheuristics
- Decomposition
- Comparison
- Methodology
- Continuous optimization
- Optimization
- Artificial Intelligence
- decision support
- Algorithm similarity
- 22/1 OA procedure