@article{dc6524610ede4fbe81d52d866036a998,
title = "Simulation of ecosystem fluxes with the SCOPE model: Sensitivity to parametrization and evaluation with flux tower observations",
abstract = "Accurate estimates of carbon, water and energy fluxes between the Earth surface and the atmosphere are crucial for enhancing our understanding of ecosystem–climate interactions. Such estimates can be made by combining remote sensing derived land surface parameters with climate reanalysis data. We analysed to what degree generic (plant functional type (PFT)-independent) satellite-derived vegetation properties and climate reanalysis data can explain land surface fluxes and to what extent the PFT-specific information extends the flux simulations. For this purpose, we used the Soil Canopy Observation, Photochemistry and Energy fluxes (SCOPE) model, which combines radiative transfer in plant leaves and vegetation canopies with photosynthesis and energy balance in a single model representation of the vegetation. We evaluated the performance of SCOPE in simulating fluxes by comparison to 63 eddy covariance sites representing 10 PFTs. We varied the sources of maximum carboxylation capacity (Vcmax25) and BallBerrySlope values (default vs literature), the seasonality of Vcmax25 and the meteorological forcing (locally measured and climate reanalysis). The average performance of daily flux in terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE) was 2.3 ± 0.8 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 (R2= 0.74 ± 0.12) for gross primary productivity (GPP), 24 ± 8 W m−2 (R2= 0.68 ± 0.16) for latent heat flux (λE) and 50 ± 15 W m−2 (R20.47±0.17) for sensible heat flux (H). The inter-site variability of the annual accumulated GPP flux was captured well with seasonally varying PFT-specific Vcmax25 (R2= 0.74, RMSE = 308 g C m−2 yr−1 and bias = −68 g C m−2 yr−1). The annual accumulated evapotranspiration (ET) was overestimated (R2= 0.31, RMSE = 101 mm yr−1 and bias = 37 mm yr−1), mainly in the ecosystems with subtropical Mediterranean climate, for which the soil resistance to evaporation from porous space (rss) had to be constrained from soil moisture content (SMC) or land surface temperature (LST). Overall, the study demonstrates that SCOPE model can simulate ecosystem flux with high accuracy without site-specific calibration of its parameters.",
keywords = "Ball-Berry slope, ECMWF, ERA5, ET, GPP, LAI, LE, OLCI, SCOPE model, Sentinel-3, Vcmax, UT-Hybrid-D",
author = "Egor Prikaziuk and Mirco Migliavacca and Su, \{Zhongbo (Bob)\} and \{van der Tol\}, Christiaan",
note = "Funding Information: The authors thank Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC) for computational support and the Warm Winter 2020 Task Force and the Ecosystem Thematic Centre of the ICOS Research Infrastructure for data provision. This research was supported by the Action CA17134 SENSECO (Optical synergies for spatiotemporal sensing of scalable ecophysiological traits) funded by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology, www.cost.eu ). Data acquisition at FR-Aur and FR-Lam are mainly funded by the Institut National des Sciences de l{\textquoteright}Univers (INSU) through the ICOS ERIC and the OSR SW observatory ( https://osr.cesbio.cnrs.fr/ ). Facilities and staff are funded and supported by the Observatory Midi-Pyrenean , the University Paul Sabatier of Toulouse 3 , CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) , CNES (Centre National d{\textquoteright}Etude Spatial) and IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le D{\'e}veloppement) . We are grateful to Franck Granouillac, Baptiste Lemaire, Nicole Claverie and Bartosz Zawilski for their technical support, advice, and valuable assistance in the field and site management, respectively. We also thank Tiphaine Tallec and Aurore Brut for the data processing. Special thanks to Mr. Andr{\'e}oni (farmer) and Ecole d{\textquoteright}Ing{\'e}nieurs Purpan and farmers for accommodating the measurement devices Funding Information: EP, MM and CvdT has received funding from the European Union{\textquoteright}s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 721995 . Funding Information: EP, MM and CvdT has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 721995.The authors thank Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC) for computational support and the Warm Winter 2020 Task Force and the Ecosystem Thematic Centre of the ICOS Research Infrastructure for data provision. This research was supported by the Action CA17134 SENSECO (Optical synergies for spatiotemporal sensing of scalable ecophysiological traits) funded by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology, www.cost.eu). Data acquisition at FR-Aur and FR-Lam are mainly funded by the Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers (INSU) through the ICOS ERIC and the OSR SW observatory (https://osr.cesbio.cnrs.fr/). Facilities and staff are funded and supported by the Observatory Midi-Pyrenean, the University Paul Sabatier of Toulouse 3, CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), CNES (Centre National d'Etude Spatial) and IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le D{\'e}veloppement). We are grateful to Franck Granouillac, Baptiste Lemaire, Nicole Claverie and Bartosz Zawilski for their technical support, advice, and valuable assistance in the field and site management, respectively. We also thank Tiphaine Tallec and Aurore Brut for the data processing. Special thanks to Mr. Andr{\'e}oni (farmer) and Ecole d'Ing{\'e}nieurs Purpan and farmers for accommodating the measurement devices Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",
year = "2023",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.rse.2022.113324",
language = "English",
volume = "284",
journal = "Remote sensing of environment",
issn = "0034-4257",
publisher = "Elsevier",
}