Abstract
The prescribed cut-off points for all three CO monitors generate misleading results concerning the determination of the smoking status in both populations after a 12-hour period of abstinence. For the measurement of CO over time, it can be concluded that smokers are able to deceive CO monitors by short-time abstinence, unless the cut-off
points are being adjusted properly. The optimal cut-off points depend upon the goal of the study but salivary cotinine measurements outperforms the CO measurements and can therefore be considered the `gold standard¿. Cotinine measurements are relatively costly;
a cost-effective validation procedure combining both tools is therefore recommended.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Awarding Institution |
|
| Supervisors/Advisors |
|
| Award date | 24 Mar 2006 |
| Place of Publication | Enschede |
| Publisher | |
| Print ISBNs | 90-365-2315-X |
| Publication status | Published - 24 Mar 2006 |