SOA and EDA: a comparative study - similarities, difference and conceptual guidelines on their usage

Zaharah  Allah Bukhsh; Marten J. van Sinderen; Prince Mayurank Singh

doi:10.5220/0005539802130220

SOA and EDA: a comparative study - similarities, difference and conceptual guidelines on their usage

Zaharah Allah Bukhsh, Marten J. van Sinderen, Prince Mayurank Singh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Changing business requirements and new technologies trigger the business stakeholders to shift their approach from many small isolated systems to a single connected system. Integration of isolated systems is partially supported by service oriented architecture (SOA) and event driven architecture (EDA), each of which provides a set of system design guidelines. Since the purpose of both architectures is similar, the stakeholders have to make a choice on which architecture to use. The objective of this paper is to investigate the differences between SOA and EDA and provide conceptual guidelines on which architecture to consider for a given set of requirements. Apart from literature, we have considered various online resources (blogs, forums) that argue about differences and similarities between SOA and EDA. To clarify the design principles of both architectures, we present a case study of a learning management system (LMS).

Original language	Undefined
Title of host publication	Twelfth International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015
Place of Publication	Lisbon
Publisher	SCITEPRESS
Pages	213-220
Number of pages	8
ISBN (Print)	978-989-758-113-7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.5220/0005539802130220
Publication status	Published - 2015
Event	12th International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015 - Colmar, Alsace, France Duration: 20 Jul 2015 → 22 Jul 2015 Conference number: 12 http://www.ice-b.icete.org/?y=2015

Publication series

Name
Publisher	SciTePress

Conference

Conference	12th International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015
Abbreviated title	ICE-B
Country	France
City	Colmar, Alsace
Period	20/07/15 → 22/07/15
Internet address	http://www.ice-b.icete.org/?y=2015

Keywords

EWI-26307
SCS-Services
Learning management system
IR-97325
Service Oriented Architecture
Event driven architecture
METIS-312723
SOA 2.0

Access to Document

10.5220/0005539802130220

http://eprints.eemcs.utwente.nl/secure2/26307/01/SOAandEDA.pdf

Cite this

@inproceedings{8c249705c51d4398895b582f1162e29e,

title = "SOA and EDA: a comparative study - similarities, difference and conceptual guidelines on their usage",

abstract = "Changing business requirements and new technologies trigger the business stakeholders to shift their approach from many small isolated systems to a single connected system. Integration of isolated systems is partially supported by service oriented architecture (SOA) and event driven architecture (EDA), each of which provides a set of system design guidelines. Since the purpose of both architectures is similar, the stakeholders have to make a choice on which architecture to use. The objective of this paper is to investigate the differences between SOA and EDA and provide conceptual guidelines on which architecture to consider for a given set of requirements. Apart from literature, we have considered various online resources (blogs, forums) that argue about differences and similarities between SOA and EDA. To clarify the design principles of both architectures, we present a case study of a learning management system (LMS).",

keywords = "EWI-26307, SCS-Services, Learning management system, IR-97325, Service Oriented Architecture, Event driven architecture, METIS-312723, SOA 2.0",

author = "{Allah Bukhsh}, Zaharah and {van Sinderen}, {Marten J.} and Singh, {Prince Mayurank}",

note = "10.5220/0005539802130220 ; null ; Conference date: 20-07-2015 Through 22-07-2015",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.5220/0005539802130220",

language = "Undefined",

isbn = "978-989-758-113-7",

publisher = "SCITEPRESS",

pages = "213--220",

booktitle = "Twelfth International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015",

url = "http://www.ice-b.icete.org/?y=2015",

}

Allah Bukhsh, Z, van Sinderen, MJ & Singh, PM 2015, SOA and EDA: a comparative study - similarities, difference and conceptual guidelines on their usage. in Twelfth International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015. SCITEPRESS, Lisbon, pp. 213-220, 12th International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015, Colmar, Alsace, France, 20/07/15. https://doi.org/10.5220/0005539802130220

SOA and EDA: a comparative study - similarities, difference and conceptual guidelines on their usage. / Allah Bukhsh, Zaharah ; van Sinderen, Marten J.; Singh, Prince Mayurank.

Twelfth International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015. Lisbon : SCITEPRESS, 2015. p. 213-220.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - SOA and EDA: a comparative study - similarities, difference and conceptual guidelines on their usage

AU - Allah Bukhsh, Zaharah

AU - van Sinderen, Marten J.

AU - Singh, Prince Mayurank

N1 - Conference code: 12

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Changing business requirements and new technologies trigger the business stakeholders to shift their approach from many small isolated systems to a single connected system. Integration of isolated systems is partially supported by service oriented architecture (SOA) and event driven architecture (EDA), each of which provides a set of system design guidelines. Since the purpose of both architectures is similar, the stakeholders have to make a choice on which architecture to use. The objective of this paper is to investigate the differences between SOA and EDA and provide conceptual guidelines on which architecture to consider for a given set of requirements. Apart from literature, we have considered various online resources (blogs, forums) that argue about differences and similarities between SOA and EDA. To clarify the design principles of both architectures, we present a case study of a learning management system (LMS).

AB - Changing business requirements and new technologies trigger the business stakeholders to shift their approach from many small isolated systems to a single connected system. Integration of isolated systems is partially supported by service oriented architecture (SOA) and event driven architecture (EDA), each of which provides a set of system design guidelines. Since the purpose of both architectures is similar, the stakeholders have to make a choice on which architecture to use. The objective of this paper is to investigate the differences between SOA and EDA and provide conceptual guidelines on which architecture to consider for a given set of requirements. Apart from literature, we have considered various online resources (blogs, forums) that argue about differences and similarities between SOA and EDA. To clarify the design principles of both architectures, we present a case study of a learning management system (LMS).

KW - EWI-26307

KW - SCS-Services

KW - Learning management system

KW - IR-97325

KW - Service Oriented Architecture

KW - Event driven architecture

KW - METIS-312723

KW - SOA 2.0

U2 - 10.5220/0005539802130220

DO - 10.5220/0005539802130220

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-989-758-113-7

SP - 213

EP - 220

BT - Twelfth International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015

PB - SCITEPRESS

CY - Lisbon

Y2 - 20 July 2015 through 22 July 2015

ER -