Abstract
| Original language | Undefined |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Twelfth International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015 |
| Place of Publication | Lisbon |
| Publisher | SCITEPRESS |
| Pages | 213-220 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-989-758-113-7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2015 |
| Event | 12th International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015 - Colmar, Alsace, France Duration: 20 Jul 2015 → 22 Jul 2015 Conference number: 12 http://www.ice-b.icete.org/?y=2015 |
Publication series
| Name | |
|---|---|
| Publisher | SciTePress |
Conference
| Conference | 12th International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | ICE-B |
| Country | France |
| City | Colmar, Alsace |
| Period | 20/07/15 → 22/07/15 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- EWI-26307
- SCS-Services
- Learning management system
- IR-97325
- Service Oriented Architecture
- Event driven architecture
- METIS-312723
- SOA 2.0
Cite this
}
SOA and EDA: a comparative study - similarities, difference and conceptual guidelines on their usage. / Allah Bukhsh, Zaharah ; van Sinderen, Marten J.; Singh, Prince Mayurank.
Twelfth International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015. Lisbon : SCITEPRESS, 2015. p. 213-220.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review
TY - GEN
T1 - SOA and EDA: a comparative study - similarities, difference and conceptual guidelines on their usage
AU - Allah Bukhsh, Zaharah
AU - van Sinderen, Marten J.
AU - Singh, Prince Mayurank
N1 - 10.5220/0005539802130220
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Changing business requirements and new technologies trigger the business stakeholders to shift their approach from many small isolated systems to a single connected system. Integration of isolated systems is partially supported by service oriented architecture (SOA) and event driven architecture (EDA), each of which provides a set of system design guidelines. Since the purpose of both architectures is similar, the stakeholders have to make a choice on which architecture to use. The objective of this paper is to investigate the differences between SOA and EDA and provide conceptual guidelines on which architecture to consider for a given set of requirements. Apart from literature, we have considered various online resources (blogs, forums) that argue about differences and similarities between SOA and EDA. To clarify the design principles of both architectures, we present a case study of a learning management system (LMS).
AB - Changing business requirements and new technologies trigger the business stakeholders to shift their approach from many small isolated systems to a single connected system. Integration of isolated systems is partially supported by service oriented architecture (SOA) and event driven architecture (EDA), each of which provides a set of system design guidelines. Since the purpose of both architectures is similar, the stakeholders have to make a choice on which architecture to use. The objective of this paper is to investigate the differences between SOA and EDA and provide conceptual guidelines on which architecture to consider for a given set of requirements. Apart from literature, we have considered various online resources (blogs, forums) that argue about differences and similarities between SOA and EDA. To clarify the design principles of both architectures, we present a case study of a learning management system (LMS).
KW - EWI-26307
KW - SCS-Services
KW - Learning management system
KW - IR-97325
KW - Service Oriented Architecture
KW - Event driven architecture
KW - METIS-312723
KW - SOA 2.0
U2 - 10.5220/0005539802130220
DO - 10.5220/0005539802130220
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 978-989-758-113-7
SP - 213
EP - 220
BT - Twelfth International Conference on e-Business, ICE-B 2015
PB - SCITEPRESS
CY - Lisbon
ER -