Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach

P. Rutsaert, Z. Pieniak, A. Regan, A. McConnon, M. Kuttschreuter, M. Lores, N. Lozano, A. Guzzon, D Santare, W. Verbeke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

44 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Although considerable progress has been made in understanding the determinants of risk perception and in identifying the necessary components of effective food risk and benefit communication, this has not been matched with the development of efficient and appropriate communication tools. Little work has been done examining the implications of the explosion of new media and web technologies, which may offer potential for improving food risk and benefit communication. First, this study examines the views of stakeholders (n= 38) and experts (n= 33) in the food domain on the potential use of these emerging media for food risk/benefit communication. Based on in-depth interviews in six European countries (Belgium, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Spain and The Netherlands), strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of social media in food risk and benefit communication were identified. Second, a Strategic Orientation Round (SOR) was used to evaluate the relative importance of the SWOT components according to stakeholders (n= 10) and experts (n= 13). Results show that both stakeholders and experts confirm a future role of social media in food risk and benefit communication. Strengths as speed, accessibility and interaction make social media an interesting tool in crisis communication or issue awareness raising. Weaknesses as the lack of a filter, low trust, the risk of information overload and a communication preference for traditional media are acknowledged
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)84-93
Number of pages10
JournalFood policy
Volume46
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • METIS-303446
  • IR-90610

Cite this

Rutsaert, P. ; Pieniak, Z. ; Regan, A. ; McConnon, A. ; Kuttschreuter, M. ; Lores, M. ; Lozano, N. ; Guzzon, A. ; Santare, D ; Verbeke, W. / Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach. In: Food policy. 2014 ; Vol. 46. pp. 84-93.
@article{42a5ff4087fc4170ac8e9134aa1aa760,
title = "Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach",
abstract = "Although considerable progress has been made in understanding the determinants of risk perception and in identifying the necessary components of effective food risk and benefit communication, this has not been matched with the development of efficient and appropriate communication tools. Little work has been done examining the implications of the explosion of new media and web technologies, which may offer potential for improving food risk and benefit communication. First, this study examines the views of stakeholders (n= 38) and experts (n= 33) in the food domain on the potential use of these emerging media for food risk/benefit communication. Based on in-depth interviews in six European countries (Belgium, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Spain and The Netherlands), strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of social media in food risk and benefit communication were identified. Second, a Strategic Orientation Round (SOR) was used to evaluate the relative importance of the SWOT components according to stakeholders (n= 10) and experts (n= 13). Results show that both stakeholders and experts confirm a future role of social media in food risk and benefit communication. Strengths as speed, accessibility and interaction make social media an interesting tool in crisis communication or issue awareness raising. Weaknesses as the lack of a filter, low trust, the risk of information overload and a communication preference for traditional media are acknowledged",
keywords = "METIS-303446, IR-90610",
author = "P. Rutsaert and Z. Pieniak and A. Regan and A. McConnon and M. Kuttschreuter and M. Lores and N. Lozano and A. Guzzon and D Santare and W. Verbeke",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.003",
language = "Undefined",
volume = "46",
pages = "84--93",
journal = "Food policy",
issn = "0306-9192",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Rutsaert, P, Pieniak, Z, Regan, A, McConnon, A, Kuttschreuter, M, Lores, M, Lozano, N, Guzzon, A, Santare, D & Verbeke, W 2014, 'Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach' Food policy, vol. 46, pp. 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.003

Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach. / Rutsaert, P.; Pieniak, Z.; Regan, A.; McConnon, A.; Kuttschreuter, M.; Lores, M.; Lozano, N.; Guzzon, A.; Santare, D; Verbeke, W.

In: Food policy, Vol. 46, 2014, p. 84-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social media as a useful tool in food risk and benefit communication? A strategic orientation approach

AU - Rutsaert, P.

AU - Pieniak, Z.

AU - Regan, A.

AU - McConnon, A.

AU - Kuttschreuter, M.

AU - Lores, M.

AU - Lozano, N.

AU - Guzzon, A.

AU - Santare, D

AU - Verbeke, W.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Although considerable progress has been made in understanding the determinants of risk perception and in identifying the necessary components of effective food risk and benefit communication, this has not been matched with the development of efficient and appropriate communication tools. Little work has been done examining the implications of the explosion of new media and web technologies, which may offer potential for improving food risk and benefit communication. First, this study examines the views of stakeholders (n= 38) and experts (n= 33) in the food domain on the potential use of these emerging media for food risk/benefit communication. Based on in-depth interviews in six European countries (Belgium, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Spain and The Netherlands), strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of social media in food risk and benefit communication were identified. Second, a Strategic Orientation Round (SOR) was used to evaluate the relative importance of the SWOT components according to stakeholders (n= 10) and experts (n= 13). Results show that both stakeholders and experts confirm a future role of social media in food risk and benefit communication. Strengths as speed, accessibility and interaction make social media an interesting tool in crisis communication or issue awareness raising. Weaknesses as the lack of a filter, low trust, the risk of information overload and a communication preference for traditional media are acknowledged

AB - Although considerable progress has been made in understanding the determinants of risk perception and in identifying the necessary components of effective food risk and benefit communication, this has not been matched with the development of efficient and appropriate communication tools. Little work has been done examining the implications of the explosion of new media and web technologies, which may offer potential for improving food risk and benefit communication. First, this study examines the views of stakeholders (n= 38) and experts (n= 33) in the food domain on the potential use of these emerging media for food risk/benefit communication. Based on in-depth interviews in six European countries (Belgium, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Spain and The Netherlands), strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of social media in food risk and benefit communication were identified. Second, a Strategic Orientation Round (SOR) was used to evaluate the relative importance of the SWOT components according to stakeholders (n= 10) and experts (n= 13). Results show that both stakeholders and experts confirm a future role of social media in food risk and benefit communication. Strengths as speed, accessibility and interaction make social media an interesting tool in crisis communication or issue awareness raising. Weaknesses as the lack of a filter, low trust, the risk of information overload and a communication preference for traditional media are acknowledged

KW - METIS-303446

KW - IR-90610

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.02.003

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 84

EP - 93

JO - Food policy

JF - Food policy

SN - 0306-9192

ER -