TY - JOUR
T1 - Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) at TiO2 electrodes in li-ion batteries
T2 - Defining apparent and effective SEI based on evidence from X-ay photoemission spectroscopy and scanning electrochemical microscopy
AU - Ventosa, Edgar
AU - Madej, Edyta
AU - Zampardi, Giorgia
AU - Mei, Bastian
AU - Weide, Philipp
AU - Antoni, Hendrik
AU - La Mantia, Fabio
AU - Muhler, Martin
AU - Schuhmann, Wolfgang
PY - 2017/1/25
Y1 - 2017/1/25
N2 - The high (de)lithiation potential of TiO2 (ca. 1.7 V vs Li/ Li+ in 1 M Li+) decreases the voltage and, thus, the energy density of a corresponding Li-ion battery. On the other hand, it offers several advantages such as the (de)lithiation potential far from lithium deposition or absence of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). The latter is currently under controversial debate as several studies reported the presence of a SEI when operating TiO2 electrodes at potentials above 1.0 V vs Li/Li+. We investigate the formation of a SEI at anatase TiO2 electrodes by means of X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). The investigations were performed in different potential ranges, namely, during storage (without external polarization), between 3.0-2.0 V and 3.0-1.0 V vs Li/Li+, respectively. No SEI is formed when a completely dried and residues-free TiO2 electrode is cycled between 3.0 and 2.0 V vs Li/Li+. A SEI is detected by XPS in the case of samples stored for 6 weeks or cycled between 3.0 and 1.0 V vs Li/Li+. With use of SECM, it is verified that this SEI does not possess the electrically insulating character as expected for a "classic" SEI. Therefore, we propose the term apparent SEI for TiO2 electrodes to differentiate it from the protecting and ef fective SEI formed at graphite electrodes.
AB - The high (de)lithiation potential of TiO2 (ca. 1.7 V vs Li/ Li+ in 1 M Li+) decreases the voltage and, thus, the energy density of a corresponding Li-ion battery. On the other hand, it offers several advantages such as the (de)lithiation potential far from lithium deposition or absence of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). The latter is currently under controversial debate as several studies reported the presence of a SEI when operating TiO2 electrodes at potentials above 1.0 V vs Li/Li+. We investigate the formation of a SEI at anatase TiO2 electrodes by means of X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) and scanning electrochemical microscopy (SECM). The investigations were performed in different potential ranges, namely, during storage (without external polarization), between 3.0-2.0 V and 3.0-1.0 V vs Li/Li+, respectively. No SEI is formed when a completely dried and residues-free TiO2 electrode is cycled between 3.0 and 2.0 V vs Li/Li+. A SEI is detected by XPS in the case of samples stored for 6 weeks or cycled between 3.0 and 1.0 V vs Li/Li+. With use of SECM, it is verified that this SEI does not possess the electrically insulating character as expected for a "classic" SEI. Therefore, we propose the term apparent SEI for TiO2 electrodes to differentiate it from the protecting and ef fective SEI formed at graphite electrodes.
KW - Li-ion batteries
KW - Scanning electrochemical microscopy
KW - Solid electrolyte interphase
KW - Titanium dioxide
KW - X-ray photoemission spectroscopy
KW - n/a OA procedure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011105133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acsami.6b13306
DO - 10.1021/acsami.6b13306
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85011105133
SN - 1944-8244
VL - 9
SP - 3123
EP - 3130
JO - ACS applied materials & interfaces
JF - ACS applied materials & interfaces
IS - 3
ER -