Abstract
In this paper we show that direct links exist between Sraffian and Goodwinian methodologies in income distribution theory. In fact, Sraffa's Standard commodity approach and Goodwin's transformation of axes are shown to be different manifestations of the same structural approach. Both are brought under a unified framework in terms of transformations involving a transformation matrix of rank one. To obtain transparency Sraffa is shown to retain as much interdependency as possible while Goodwin sacrifies all interdependent structure. It appears that a central role is played by models related to closed models of input-output type.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 55-75 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Journal of economics |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1995 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Straffa and Goodwin: A Unifying Framework for Standards of Value in the Income Distribution Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver