Strategic boundary management in university-based living labs

Hacer Tercanli*, Ben Jongbloed, Barend van der Meulen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
53 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

University-based boundary organisations provide academics with an environment where they can interact with a wide variety of societal partners to produce knowledge and work on research projects, often of a transdisciplinary nature. This environment, however, implies that their researchers may be confronted with multiple and sometimes conflicting demands coming from various stakeholders. In this study, we focus on one such case, a Real-world Laboratory (RwL), set up by the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. This RwL focuses on urban sustainable development challenges. Drawing on boundary work literature, we analyse the boundary work strategies employed by the lab's leading researchers to manage such demands as part of a RwL research project. We observe that the managing researchers buffer several types of boundaries in order not to compromise the transdisciplinary nature of the RwL. They appear to utilise four types of boundary devices when managing boundaries: language, people, objects, and spaces. We conclude that, to reduce tensions, the managing researchers should acknowledge the presence of boundaries early on in their RwL research project, that is, during its conception phase.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12558
JournalHigher education quarterly
Volume78
Issue number4
Early online date16 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Living labs
  • Project management
  • Real-world laboratories (RwLs)
  • University-based boundary organisations
  • Boundary work

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Strategic boundary management in university-based living labs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this