TY - JOUR
T1 - Strategic boundary management in university-based living labs
AU - Tercanli, Hacer
AU - Jongbloed, Ben
AU - van der Meulen, Barend
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Higher Education Quarterly published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - University-based boundary organisations provide academics with an environment where they can interact with a wide variety of societal partners to produce knowledge and work on research projects, often of a transdisciplinary nature. This environment, however, implies that their researchers may be confronted with multiple and sometimes conflicting demands coming from various stakeholders. In this study, we focus on one such case, a Real-world Laboratory (RwL), set up by the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. This RwL focuses on urban sustainable development challenges. Drawing on boundary work literature, we analyse the boundary work strategies employed by the lab's leading researchers to manage such demands as part of a RwL research project. We observe that the managing researchers buffer several types of boundaries in order not to compromise the transdisciplinary nature of the RwL. They appear to utilise four types of boundary devices when managing boundaries: language, people, objects, and spaces. We conclude that, to reduce tensions, the managing researchers should acknowledge the presence of boundaries early on in their RwL research project, that is, during its conception phase.
AB - University-based boundary organisations provide academics with an environment where they can interact with a wide variety of societal partners to produce knowledge and work on research projects, often of a transdisciplinary nature. This environment, however, implies that their researchers may be confronted with multiple and sometimes conflicting demands coming from various stakeholders. In this study, we focus on one such case, a Real-world Laboratory (RwL), set up by the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. This RwL focuses on urban sustainable development challenges. Drawing on boundary work literature, we analyse the boundary work strategies employed by the lab's leading researchers to manage such demands as part of a RwL research project. We observe that the managing researchers buffer several types of boundaries in order not to compromise the transdisciplinary nature of the RwL. They appear to utilise four types of boundary devices when managing boundaries: language, people, objects, and spaces. We conclude that, to reduce tensions, the managing researchers should acknowledge the presence of boundaries early on in their RwL research project, that is, during its conception phase.
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
KW - Living labs
KW - Project management
KW - Real-world laboratories (RwLs)
KW - University-based boundary organisations
KW - Boundary work
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198717277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/hequ.12558
DO - 10.1111/hequ.12558
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85198717277
SN - 0951-5224
VL - 78
JO - Higher education quarterly
JF - Higher education quarterly
IS - 4
M1 - e12558
ER -