Structural higher education reform - design and evaluation: synthesis report

Jonathan M. File, Jeroen Huisman, Harry F. de Boer, Marco Seeber, Martina Vukasovic, Donald F. Westerheijden

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

130 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study analyses how different types of system-level (or ‘landscape’) structural reforms in higher education have been designed and implemented in selected higher education systems. In the 12 case studies that form the core of the project, the researchers examine reforms aimed at: - Increasing horizontal differentiation between different types of higher education institutions (for example reforms to introduce or modify the role of universities of applied science); - Increasing vertical differentiation through increasing or decreasing positional or status differences between higher education institutions (for example, reforms aimed at concentrating research in a limited number of universities) and; - Changing institutional interrelationships between higher education institutions (for example, through mergers, the formation of associations of institutions). In each case, the researchers set out to understand the origins and objectives of the reforms examined, the why they were designed and implemented, the extent to which they achieved their objectives and the factors affecting success or failure. The overall objective is to provide policy makers at the European, national and institutional levels with policy relevant conclusions concerning the design, implementation and evaluation of structural reforms
Original languageEnglish
PublisherPublications Office of the European Union
Number of pages54
ISBN (Print)978-92-79-55123-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Publication series

Name
PublisherPublications Office of the European Union

Fingerprint

reform
structural reform
evaluation
education
applied science
university
merger
education system

Keywords

  • IR-102882
  • METIS-320396

Cite this

File, Jonathan M. ; Huisman, Jeroen ; de Boer, Harry F. ; Seeber, Marco ; Vukasovic, Martina ; Westerheijden, Donald F. / Structural higher education reform - design and evaluation: synthesis report. Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. 54 p.
@book{92621eb89e7e404d9e42bdbe4c4ef02e,
title = "Structural higher education reform - design and evaluation: synthesis report",
abstract = "This study analyses how different types of system-level (or ‘landscape’) structural reforms in higher education have been designed and implemented in selected higher education systems. In the 12 case studies that form the core of the project, the researchers examine reforms aimed at: - Increasing horizontal differentiation between different types of higher education institutions (for example reforms to introduce or modify the role of universities of applied science); - Increasing vertical differentiation through increasing or decreasing positional or status differences between higher education institutions (for example, reforms aimed at concentrating research in a limited number of universities) and; - Changing institutional interrelationships between higher education institutions (for example, through mergers, the formation of associations of institutions). In each case, the researchers set out to understand the origins and objectives of the reforms examined, the why they were designed and implemented, the extent to which they achieved their objectives and the factors affecting success or failure. The overall objective is to provide policy makers at the European, national and institutional levels with policy relevant conclusions concerning the design, implementation and evaluation of structural reforms",
keywords = "IR-102882, METIS-320396",
author = "File, {Jonathan M.} and Jeroen Huisman and {de Boer}, {Harry F.} and Marco Seeber and Martina Vukasovic and Westerheijden, {Donald F.}",
note = "Open access. Contract no EAC-2014-0474",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.2766/79662",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-92-79-55123-9",
publisher = "Publications Office of the European Union",

}

Structural higher education reform - design and evaluation: synthesis report. / File, Jonathan M.; Huisman, Jeroen; de Boer, Harry F.; Seeber, Marco; Vukasovic, Martina; Westerheijden, Donald F.

Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. 54 p.

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

TY - BOOK

T1 - Structural higher education reform - design and evaluation: synthesis report

AU - File, Jonathan M.

AU - Huisman, Jeroen

AU - de Boer, Harry F.

AU - Seeber, Marco

AU - Vukasovic, Martina

AU - Westerheijden, Donald F.

N1 - Open access. Contract no EAC-2014-0474

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This study analyses how different types of system-level (or ‘landscape’) structural reforms in higher education have been designed and implemented in selected higher education systems. In the 12 case studies that form the core of the project, the researchers examine reforms aimed at: - Increasing horizontal differentiation between different types of higher education institutions (for example reforms to introduce or modify the role of universities of applied science); - Increasing vertical differentiation through increasing or decreasing positional or status differences between higher education institutions (for example, reforms aimed at concentrating research in a limited number of universities) and; - Changing institutional interrelationships between higher education institutions (for example, through mergers, the formation of associations of institutions). In each case, the researchers set out to understand the origins and objectives of the reforms examined, the why they were designed and implemented, the extent to which they achieved their objectives and the factors affecting success or failure. The overall objective is to provide policy makers at the European, national and institutional levels with policy relevant conclusions concerning the design, implementation and evaluation of structural reforms

AB - This study analyses how different types of system-level (or ‘landscape’) structural reforms in higher education have been designed and implemented in selected higher education systems. In the 12 case studies that form the core of the project, the researchers examine reforms aimed at: - Increasing horizontal differentiation between different types of higher education institutions (for example reforms to introduce or modify the role of universities of applied science); - Increasing vertical differentiation through increasing or decreasing positional or status differences between higher education institutions (for example, reforms aimed at concentrating research in a limited number of universities) and; - Changing institutional interrelationships between higher education institutions (for example, through mergers, the formation of associations of institutions). In each case, the researchers set out to understand the origins and objectives of the reforms examined, the why they were designed and implemented, the extent to which they achieved their objectives and the factors affecting success or failure. The overall objective is to provide policy makers at the European, national and institutional levels with policy relevant conclusions concerning the design, implementation and evaluation of structural reforms

KW - IR-102882

KW - METIS-320396

U2 - 10.2766/79662

DO - 10.2766/79662

M3 - Report

SN - 978-92-79-55123-9

BT - Structural higher education reform - design and evaluation: synthesis report

PB - Publications Office of the European Union

ER -