TY - JOUR
T1 - Submillisievert coronary calcium quantification using model-based iterative reconstruction
T2 - A within-patient analysis
AU - den Harder, Annemarie M.
AU - Wolterink, Jelmer M.
AU - Willemink, Martin J.
AU - Schilham, Arnold M.R.
AU - de Jong, Pim A.
AU - Budde, Ricardo P.J.
AU - Nathoe, Hendrik M.
AU - Išgum, Ivana
AU - Leiner, Tim
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Purpose To determine the effect of model-based iterative reconstruction (IR) on coronary calcium quantification using different submillisievert CT acquisition protocols. Methods Twenty-eight patients received a clinically indicated non contrast-enhanced cardiac CT. After the routine dose acquisition, low-dose acquisitions were performed with 60%, 40% and 20% of the routine dose mAs. Images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid IR (HIR) and model-based IR (MIR) and Agatston scores, calcium volumes and calcium mass scores were determined. Results Effective dose was 0.9, 0.5, 0.4 and 0.2 mSv, respectively. At 0.5 and 0.4 mSv, differences in Agatston scores with both HIR and MIR compared to FBP at routine dose were small (−0.1 to −2.9%), while at 0.2 mSv, differences in Agatston scores of −12.6 to −14.6% occurred. Reclassification of risk category at reduced dose levels was more frequent with MIR (21–25%) than with HIR (18%). Conclusions Radiation dose for coronary calcium scoring can be safely reduced to 0.4 mSv using both HIR and MIR, while FBP is not feasible at these dose levels due to excessive noise. Further dose reduction can lead to an underestimation in Agatston score and subsequent reclassification to lower risk categories. Mass scores were unaffected by dose reductions.
AB - Purpose To determine the effect of model-based iterative reconstruction (IR) on coronary calcium quantification using different submillisievert CT acquisition protocols. Methods Twenty-eight patients received a clinically indicated non contrast-enhanced cardiac CT. After the routine dose acquisition, low-dose acquisitions were performed with 60%, 40% and 20% of the routine dose mAs. Images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), hybrid IR (HIR) and model-based IR (MIR) and Agatston scores, calcium volumes and calcium mass scores were determined. Results Effective dose was 0.9, 0.5, 0.4 and 0.2 mSv, respectively. At 0.5 and 0.4 mSv, differences in Agatston scores with both HIR and MIR compared to FBP at routine dose were small (−0.1 to −2.9%), while at 0.2 mSv, differences in Agatston scores of −12.6 to −14.6% occurred. Reclassification of risk category at reduced dose levels was more frequent with MIR (21–25%) than with HIR (18%). Conclusions Radiation dose for coronary calcium scoring can be safely reduced to 0.4 mSv using both HIR and MIR, while FBP is not feasible at these dose levels due to excessive noise. Further dose reduction can lead to an underestimation in Agatston score and subsequent reclassification to lower risk categories. Mass scores were unaffected by dose reductions.
KW - Cardiac
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Coronary artery calcification
KW - Iterative reconstruction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991486779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.028
DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 27776671
AN - SCOPUS:84991486779
SN - 0720-048X
VL - 85
SP - 2152
EP - 2159
JO - European journal of radiology
JF - European journal of radiology
IS - 11
ER -