Successive melting and solidification of paraffin–alumina nanomaterial in a cavity as a latent heat thermal energy storage

R Yadollahi Farsani*, A. Raisi, Amirhoushang Mahmoudi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) plays a main role in many industrial applications, especially in high-powered electronics cooling systems and providing the thermal energy demand when the energy supply is unavailable. In this study, the LHTES cycle process, including successive melting and solidification, investigates in a two-dimensional annular space of a square cavity filled with nanomaterial of paraffin–alumina as a nanoPCM. In the melting process, all sidewalls of the cavity are insulated. Meanwhile, a constant heat rate generates homogeneously within the central heat source. At the end of melting, the heat generation gets off, while a time-reducing temperature lower than the paraffin melting point imposes on the sidewalls, and then, solidification triggers. The numerical simulation was accomplished using control volume method and the governing equations solved using the SIMPLE algorithm. The enthalpy-porosity method was employed to model the phase-change front. The value of thermal conductivity and the viscosity of the nanofluid have been experimentally measured before the numerical modeling. In this study, the effect of volume fraction of nanoparticles (0–0.03) has been investigated on the successive melting and solidification rate for a constant Rayleigh number of 5.74 × 105. The results show that adding nanoparticles to the PCM equal to the volume fractions of 0.01 and 0.02 improves melting rate, but the nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.03 represents a poor heat transfer rate during melting even weaker than those for nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.01. It also observed that the nanomaterial with the volume fraction of φ = 0.03 represents the highest solidification rate. However, taking the overall performance of successive melting and solidification system into account, the nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.02 remarked the most effective heat transfer rate in comparison with the other examined cases.
Original languageEnglish
Article number368
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering
Volume41
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Latent heat
Thermal energy
Nanostructured materials
Energy storage
Solidification
Melting
Volume fraction
Electronic cooling
Nanoparticles
Heat transfer
Pulse code modulation
Heat generation
Cooling systems
Paraffins
Industrial applications
Melting point
Enthalpy
Thermal conductivity
Porosity
Viscosity

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D

Cite this

@article{5be68a9191a641138531907a509057f2,
title = "Successive melting and solidification of paraffin–alumina nanomaterial in a cavity as a latent heat thermal energy storage",
abstract = "Latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) plays a main role in many industrial applications, especially in high-powered electronics cooling systems and providing the thermal energy demand when the energy supply is unavailable. In this study, the LHTES cycle process, including successive melting and solidification, investigates in a two-dimensional annular space of a square cavity filled with nanomaterial of paraffin–alumina as a nanoPCM. In the melting process, all sidewalls of the cavity are insulated. Meanwhile, a constant heat rate generates homogeneously within the central heat source. At the end of melting, the heat generation gets off, while a time-reducing temperature lower than the paraffin melting point imposes on the sidewalls, and then, solidification triggers. The numerical simulation was accomplished using control volume method and the governing equations solved using the SIMPLE algorithm. The enthalpy-porosity method was employed to model the phase-change front. The value of thermal conductivity and the viscosity of the nanofluid have been experimentally measured before the numerical modeling. In this study, the effect of volume fraction of nanoparticles (0–0.03) has been investigated on the successive melting and solidification rate for a constant Rayleigh number of 5.74 × 105. The results show that adding nanoparticles to the PCM equal to the volume fractions of 0.01 and 0.02 improves melting rate, but the nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.03 represents a poor heat transfer rate during melting even weaker than those for nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.01. It also observed that the nanomaterial with the volume fraction of φ = 0.03 represents the highest solidification rate. However, taking the overall performance of successive melting and solidification system into account, the nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.02 remarked the most effective heat transfer rate in comparison with the other examined cases.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D",
author = "{Yadollahi Farsani}, R and A. Raisi and Amirhoushang Mahmoudi",
note = "Springer deal",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s40430-019-1859-8",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
journal = "Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering",
issn = "1678-5878",
publisher = "Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering",

}

Successive melting and solidification of paraffin–alumina nanomaterial in a cavity as a latent heat thermal energy storage. / Yadollahi Farsani, R; Raisi, A.; Mahmoudi, Amirhoushang .

In: Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 41, 368, 01.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Successive melting and solidification of paraffin–alumina nanomaterial in a cavity as a latent heat thermal energy storage

AU - Yadollahi Farsani, R

AU - Raisi, A.

AU - Mahmoudi, Amirhoushang

N1 - Springer deal

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) plays a main role in many industrial applications, especially in high-powered electronics cooling systems and providing the thermal energy demand when the energy supply is unavailable. In this study, the LHTES cycle process, including successive melting and solidification, investigates in a two-dimensional annular space of a square cavity filled with nanomaterial of paraffin–alumina as a nanoPCM. In the melting process, all sidewalls of the cavity are insulated. Meanwhile, a constant heat rate generates homogeneously within the central heat source. At the end of melting, the heat generation gets off, while a time-reducing temperature lower than the paraffin melting point imposes on the sidewalls, and then, solidification triggers. The numerical simulation was accomplished using control volume method and the governing equations solved using the SIMPLE algorithm. The enthalpy-porosity method was employed to model the phase-change front. The value of thermal conductivity and the viscosity of the nanofluid have been experimentally measured before the numerical modeling. In this study, the effect of volume fraction of nanoparticles (0–0.03) has been investigated on the successive melting and solidification rate for a constant Rayleigh number of 5.74 × 105. The results show that adding nanoparticles to the PCM equal to the volume fractions of 0.01 and 0.02 improves melting rate, but the nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.03 represents a poor heat transfer rate during melting even weaker than those for nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.01. It also observed that the nanomaterial with the volume fraction of φ = 0.03 represents the highest solidification rate. However, taking the overall performance of successive melting and solidification system into account, the nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.02 remarked the most effective heat transfer rate in comparison with the other examined cases.

AB - Latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) plays a main role in many industrial applications, especially in high-powered electronics cooling systems and providing the thermal energy demand when the energy supply is unavailable. In this study, the LHTES cycle process, including successive melting and solidification, investigates in a two-dimensional annular space of a square cavity filled with nanomaterial of paraffin–alumina as a nanoPCM. In the melting process, all sidewalls of the cavity are insulated. Meanwhile, a constant heat rate generates homogeneously within the central heat source. At the end of melting, the heat generation gets off, while a time-reducing temperature lower than the paraffin melting point imposes on the sidewalls, and then, solidification triggers. The numerical simulation was accomplished using control volume method and the governing equations solved using the SIMPLE algorithm. The enthalpy-porosity method was employed to model the phase-change front. The value of thermal conductivity and the viscosity of the nanofluid have been experimentally measured before the numerical modeling. In this study, the effect of volume fraction of nanoparticles (0–0.03) has been investigated on the successive melting and solidification rate for a constant Rayleigh number of 5.74 × 105. The results show that adding nanoparticles to the PCM equal to the volume fractions of 0.01 and 0.02 improves melting rate, but the nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.03 represents a poor heat transfer rate during melting even weaker than those for nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.01. It also observed that the nanomaterial with the volume fraction of φ = 0.03 represents the highest solidification rate. However, taking the overall performance of successive melting and solidification system into account, the nanofluid with the volume fraction of 0.02 remarked the most effective heat transfer rate in comparison with the other examined cases.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

U2 - 10.1007/s40430-019-1859-8

DO - 10.1007/s40430-019-1859-8

M3 - Article

VL - 41

JO - Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering

JF - Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering

SN - 1678-5878

M1 - 368

ER -