TY - JOUR
T1 - [18F]FDG-PET/CT in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients with COVID-19 ARDS and persistent inflammation
AU - van Leer, Bram
AU - van Snick, Johannes H.
AU - Londema, Mark
AU - Nijsten, Maarten W.N.
AU - Kasalak, Ömer
AU - Slart, Riemer H.J.A.
AU - Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M.
AU - Pillay, Janesh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Purpose: We report the findings of four critically ill patients who underwent an [18F]FDG-PET/CT because of persistent inflammation during the late phase of their COVID-19. Methods: Four mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 were retrospectively discussed in a research group to evaluate the added value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Results: Although pulmonary PET/CT findings differed, bilateral lung anomalies could explain the increased CRP and leukocytes in all patients. This underscores the limited ability of the routine laboratory to discriminate inflammation from secondary infections. Based on PET/CT findings, a secondary infection/inflammatory focus was suspected in two patients (pancreatitis and gastritis). Lymphadenopathy was present in patients with a detectable SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Muscle uptake around the hips or shoulders was observed in all patients, possibly due to the process of heterotopic ossification. Conclusion: This case series illustrates the diagnostic potential of [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging in critically ill patients with persistent COVID-19 for the identification of other causes of inflammation and demonstrates that this technique can be performed safely in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
AB - Purpose: We report the findings of four critically ill patients who underwent an [18F]FDG-PET/CT because of persistent inflammation during the late phase of their COVID-19. Methods: Four mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 were retrospectively discussed in a research group to evaluate the added value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT. Results: Although pulmonary PET/CT findings differed, bilateral lung anomalies could explain the increased CRP and leukocytes in all patients. This underscores the limited ability of the routine laboratory to discriminate inflammation from secondary infections. Based on PET/CT findings, a secondary infection/inflammatory focus was suspected in two patients (pancreatitis and gastritis). Lymphadenopathy was present in patients with a detectable SARS-CoV-2 viral load. Muscle uptake around the hips or shoulders was observed in all patients, possibly due to the process of heterotopic ossification. Conclusion: This case series illustrates the diagnostic potential of [18F]FDG-PET/CT imaging in critically ill patients with persistent COVID-19 for the identification of other causes of inflammation and demonstrates that this technique can be performed safely in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
KW - ARDS
KW - COVID-19
KW - Critically ill patients
KW - ICU
KW - Persistent inflammation
KW - [F]FDG-PET/CT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149793430&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40336-023-00550-y
DO - 10.1007/s40336-023-00550-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85149793430
SN - 2281-5872
VL - 11
SP - 297
EP - 306
JO - Clinical and translational imaging
JF - Clinical and translational imaging
IS - 3
ER -