Superstars without talent? The Yule distribution controversy

Laura Spierdijk, Mark Voorneveld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chung and Cox (1994) provided an intuitively appealing stochastic model indicating that superstars may exist regardless of talent, giving rise to the Yule distribution. We adopt a different empirical approach and test its goodness of fit using a parametric bootstrap and several powerful test statistics. Just like the discrete Pareto distribution, it is overwhelmingly rejected: it is a fairly accurate approximation of the lower quantiles of the superstar distribution but overestimates the snowball effect that makes consumers purchase records of the most successful artists. In other words, the Yule distribution captures stardom, but not superstardom. A generalization of the Yule distribution provides an excellent fit in two of the three data sets.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)648 - 652
JournalReview of Economics and Statistics
Volume91
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Superstars without talent? The Yule distribution controversy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this