TY - JOUR
T1 - Supporting reflection to improve learning from self-generated concept maps
AU - Eshuis, Elise H.
AU - ter Vrugte, Judith
AU - de Jong, Ton
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [project number 409–15-209], TechYourFuture, and Thales Nederland BV.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Creating concept maps is considered to be a powerful means for learning. It requires students to systematically organize and integrate their knowledge, which can foster meaningful learning. However, students scarcely spontaneously engage in the (meta)cognitive processes necessary for effective knowledge integration, such as reflection, which can hamper the effectiveness of concept mapping for learning. This study explores the effect of additional support that stimulates reflection by means of expert examples, reflection prompts, and classroom discussion. First-year technical vocational students (N = 144, Mage = 17.5 years) studied electricity-related topics in an online learning environment and created concept maps about their knowledge. Students’ concept maps were supplemented with either (1) no support (control condition), (2) an expert example (a combined concept map, containing their own and an expert example concept map, with differences highlighted), (3) an expert example and reflection prompts students had to process individually, (4) an expert example and reflection prompts students had to process individually after a teacher-guided classroom discussion. Students in the classroom discussion condition showed higher learning gains compared to all other conditions. This can be explained by the quality of their reflection, which proved to be a significant predictor of learning gain.
AB - Creating concept maps is considered to be a powerful means for learning. It requires students to systematically organize and integrate their knowledge, which can foster meaningful learning. However, students scarcely spontaneously engage in the (meta)cognitive processes necessary for effective knowledge integration, such as reflection, which can hamper the effectiveness of concept mapping for learning. This study explores the effect of additional support that stimulates reflection by means of expert examples, reflection prompts, and classroom discussion. First-year technical vocational students (N = 144, Mage = 17.5 years) studied electricity-related topics in an online learning environment and created concept maps about their knowledge. Students’ concept maps were supplemented with either (1) no support (control condition), (2) an expert example (a combined concept map, containing their own and an expert example concept map, with differences highlighted), (3) an expert example and reflection prompts students had to process individually, (4) an expert example and reflection prompts students had to process individually after a teacher-guided classroom discussion. Students in the classroom discussion condition showed higher learning gains compared to all other conditions. This can be explained by the quality of their reflection, which proved to be a significant predictor of learning gain.
KW - Classroom discussion
KW - Concept maps
KW - Expert examples
KW - Question prompts
KW - Reflection
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129651701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11409-022-09299-7
DO - 10.1007/s11409-022-09299-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85129651701
VL - 17
SP - 691
EP - 713
JO - Metacognition and learning
JF - Metacognition and learning
SN - 1556-1623
ER -