Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Surveillance Imaging after Primary Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ

  • Danalyn Byng
  • , Samantha M. Thomas
  • , Christel N. Rushing
  • , Thomas Lynch
  • , Anne McCarthy
  • , Amanda B. Francescatti
  • , Elizabeth S. Frank
  • , Ann H. Partridge
  • , Alastair M. Thompson
  • , Valesca P. Retèl
  • , Wim H. van Harten
  • , Lars J. Grimm
  • , Terry Hyslop
  • , E. Shelley Hwang
  • , Marc D. Ryser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Guidelines recommend annual surveillance imaging after diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Guideline adherence has not been characterized in a contemporary cohort. Purpose To identify uptake and determinants of surveillance imaging in women who underwent treatment for DCIS. Materials and Methods A stratified random sample of women who underwent breast-conserving surgery for primary DCIS between 2008 and 2014 was retrospectively selected from 1330 facilities in the United States. Imaging examinations were recorded from date of diagnosis until first distant recurrence, death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (November 2018). Imaging after treatment was categorized into 10 12-month periods starting 6 months after diagnosis. Primary outcome was per-period receipt of asymptomatic surveillance imaging (mammography, MRI, or US). Secondary outcome was diagnosis of ipsilateral invasive breast cancer. Multivariable logistic regression with repeated measures and generalized estimating equations was used to model receipt of imaging. Rates of diagnosis with ipsilateral invasive breast cancer were compared between women who did and those who did not undergo imaging in the 6-18-month period after diagnosis using inverse probability-weighted Kaplan-Meier estimators. Results A total of 12 559 women (median age, 60 years; IQR, 52-69 years) were evaluated. Uptake of surveillance imaging was 75% in the first period and decreased over time (P < .001). Across the first 5 years after treatment, 52% of women participated in consistent annual surveillance. Surveillance was lower in Black (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.88; P < .001) and Hispanic (OR, 0.82; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.94; P = .004) women than in White women. Women who underwent surveillance in the first period had a higher 6-year rate of diagnosis of invasive cancer (1.6%; 95% CI: 1.3, 1.9) than those who did not (1.1%; 95% CI: 0.7, 1.4; difference: 0.5%; 95% CI: 0.1, 1.0; P = .03). Conclusion Half of women did not consistently adhere to imaging surveillance guidelines across the first 5 years after treatment, with racial disparities in adherence rates.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere221210
Pages (from-to)e221210
JournalRadiology
Volume307
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • NLA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surveillance Imaging after Primary Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this