Sustainability of renewable off-grid technology for rural electrification: A comparative study using the IAD framework

Heksi Lestari (Corresponding Author), Maarten Arentsen, Hans Bressers, Budhi Gunawan, Johan Iskandar, Parikesit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper analyses the implementation of renewable off-grid technologies in rural areas, especially where an extension to the national electricity grid was not considered economically feasible. Implementation of remote, stand-alone, electricity technologies as alternatives to a grid connection to provide sustainable electricity access have often failed with many planned projects not realised or abandoned. Our initial assumption was that stand-alone electricity project exhibiting higher scores on sustainability indicators would benefit communities more and make their endurance more likely. However, the impact of the stand-alone technology was often overruled or its quality weakened by government preferences wishing to realise a connection to the central electricity grid. Empirically, the study compares three cases of stand-alone micro-hydropower projects and three cases of stand-alone solar photovoltaic projects in Bogor Regency, Indonesia. It is based on qualitative document analysis, complemented by multiple rounds of semi-structured interviews and observations. The paper assesses the extent to which each project met indicators of technical, economic, social, environmental, and institutional sustainability. The paper tries to explain the endurance of the project from these sustainability scores and uses additional explanations from Ostrom's Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. The findings show that, for the studied local communities, the attractiveness of a grid connection overrules the virtues of a stand-alone electricity project, despite its quality, successful operation and impact. Our research also shows that government policy priorities changed in the rural electrification programme for some communities. In these situations, the off-grid rural electrification programme predominantly provided only temporary access to sustainable electricity for remote local communities that remained waiting and hoping for a grid connection to connect them to fossil fuel-dominated electricity.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4512
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

rural electrification
electricity
Sustainable development
comparative study
Electricity
sustainability
endurance
community
Durability
analysis
document analysis
hydropower
project
social attraction
Fossil fuels
government policy
fossil fuel
Indonesia
rural area
Economics

Keywords

  • Endurance
  • Off-grid
  • Rules in use
  • Rural electrification
  • Sustainability

Cite this

@article{a35d829c110949938031bec7d65ed46e,
title = "Sustainability of renewable off-grid technology for rural electrification: A comparative study using the IAD framework",
abstract = "This paper analyses the implementation of renewable off-grid technologies in rural areas, especially where an extension to the national electricity grid was not considered economically feasible. Implementation of remote, stand-alone, electricity technologies as alternatives to a grid connection to provide sustainable electricity access have often failed with many planned projects not realised or abandoned. Our initial assumption was that stand-alone electricity project exhibiting higher scores on sustainability indicators would benefit communities more and make their endurance more likely. However, the impact of the stand-alone technology was often overruled or its quality weakened by government preferences wishing to realise a connection to the central electricity grid. Empirically, the study compares three cases of stand-alone micro-hydropower projects and three cases of stand-alone solar photovoltaic projects in Bogor Regency, Indonesia. It is based on qualitative document analysis, complemented by multiple rounds of semi-structured interviews and observations. The paper assesses the extent to which each project met indicators of technical, economic, social, environmental, and institutional sustainability. The paper tries to explain the endurance of the project from these sustainability scores and uses additional explanations from Ostrom's Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. The findings show that, for the studied local communities, the attractiveness of a grid connection overrules the virtues of a stand-alone electricity project, despite its quality, successful operation and impact. Our research also shows that government policy priorities changed in the rural electrification programme for some communities. In these situations, the off-grid rural electrification programme predominantly provided only temporary access to sustainable electricity for remote local communities that remained waiting and hoping for a grid connection to connect them to fossil fuel-dominated electricity.",
keywords = "Endurance, Off-grid, Rules in use, Rural electrification, Sustainability",
author = "Heksi Lestari and Maarten Arentsen and Hans Bressers and Budhi Gunawan and Johan Iskandar and Parikesit",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.3390/su10124512",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Sustainability (Switzerland)",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute",
number = "12",

}

Sustainability of renewable off-grid technology for rural electrification : A comparative study using the IAD framework. / Lestari, Heksi (Corresponding Author); Arentsen, Maarten; Bressers, Hans; Gunawan, Budhi; Iskandar, Johan; Parikesit.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 12, 4512, 30.11.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainability of renewable off-grid technology for rural electrification

T2 - A comparative study using the IAD framework

AU - Lestari, Heksi

AU - Arentsen, Maarten

AU - Bressers, Hans

AU - Gunawan, Budhi

AU - Iskandar, Johan

AU - Parikesit, null

PY - 2018/11/30

Y1 - 2018/11/30

N2 - This paper analyses the implementation of renewable off-grid technologies in rural areas, especially where an extension to the national electricity grid was not considered economically feasible. Implementation of remote, stand-alone, electricity technologies as alternatives to a grid connection to provide sustainable electricity access have often failed with many planned projects not realised or abandoned. Our initial assumption was that stand-alone electricity project exhibiting higher scores on sustainability indicators would benefit communities more and make their endurance more likely. However, the impact of the stand-alone technology was often overruled or its quality weakened by government preferences wishing to realise a connection to the central electricity grid. Empirically, the study compares three cases of stand-alone micro-hydropower projects and three cases of stand-alone solar photovoltaic projects in Bogor Regency, Indonesia. It is based on qualitative document analysis, complemented by multiple rounds of semi-structured interviews and observations. The paper assesses the extent to which each project met indicators of technical, economic, social, environmental, and institutional sustainability. The paper tries to explain the endurance of the project from these sustainability scores and uses additional explanations from Ostrom's Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. The findings show that, for the studied local communities, the attractiveness of a grid connection overrules the virtues of a stand-alone electricity project, despite its quality, successful operation and impact. Our research also shows that government policy priorities changed in the rural electrification programme for some communities. In these situations, the off-grid rural electrification programme predominantly provided only temporary access to sustainable electricity for remote local communities that remained waiting and hoping for a grid connection to connect them to fossil fuel-dominated electricity.

AB - This paper analyses the implementation of renewable off-grid technologies in rural areas, especially where an extension to the national electricity grid was not considered economically feasible. Implementation of remote, stand-alone, electricity technologies as alternatives to a grid connection to provide sustainable electricity access have often failed with many planned projects not realised or abandoned. Our initial assumption was that stand-alone electricity project exhibiting higher scores on sustainability indicators would benefit communities more and make their endurance more likely. However, the impact of the stand-alone technology was often overruled or its quality weakened by government preferences wishing to realise a connection to the central electricity grid. Empirically, the study compares three cases of stand-alone micro-hydropower projects and three cases of stand-alone solar photovoltaic projects in Bogor Regency, Indonesia. It is based on qualitative document analysis, complemented by multiple rounds of semi-structured interviews and observations. The paper assesses the extent to which each project met indicators of technical, economic, social, environmental, and institutional sustainability. The paper tries to explain the endurance of the project from these sustainability scores and uses additional explanations from Ostrom's Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. The findings show that, for the studied local communities, the attractiveness of a grid connection overrules the virtues of a stand-alone electricity project, despite its quality, successful operation and impact. Our research also shows that government policy priorities changed in the rural electrification programme for some communities. In these situations, the off-grid rural electrification programme predominantly provided only temporary access to sustainable electricity for remote local communities that remained waiting and hoping for a grid connection to connect them to fossil fuel-dominated electricity.

KW - Endurance

KW - Off-grid

KW - Rules in use

KW - Rural electrification

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057840726&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/su10124512

DO - 10.3390/su10124512

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Sustainability (Switzerland)

JF - Sustainability (Switzerland)

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 12

M1 - 4512

ER -