Sustainability reporting by local governments: a magic tool? Lessons on use and usefulness from European pioneers

Ludger Niemann (Corresponding Author), Thomas Hoppe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)
89 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A growing number of city governments worldwide engage in sustainability reporting, voluntarily and responding to legal pressures. Diverse practices emerged based on unique choices concerning formats, periodicity, authorship and dissemination efforts. Such design questions and associated outcomes are highly relevant for practitioners yet unaddressed in standard guidelines and most prior research that primarily concern content and conjectured reporting benefits. This article presents a framework suited to assessing real-life practices and outcomes. An exploratory evaluation in Amsterdam, Basel, Dublin, Freiburg, Nuremberg and Zurich suggests that sustainability reporting can benefit organizational change, management and communication yet also lead to ‘fatigue’ and discontinuation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)201-223
Number of pages23
JournalPublic management review
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
Fatigue of materials
Communication
Pioneers
Local government
Usefulness
Sustainability reporting
Evaluation
Fatigue
Authorship
Organizational change management
Government
Dissemination
Periodicity
Basel

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • integrated reporting
  • local governments
  • sustainability indicators
  • Sustainability reporting
  • GRI

Cite this

@article{a814ea4275f4408f9380ece83483a427,
title = "Sustainability reporting by local governments: a magic tool?: Lessons on use and usefulness from European pioneers",
abstract = "A growing number of city governments worldwide engage in sustainability reporting, voluntarily and responding to legal pressures. Diverse practices emerged based on unique choices concerning formats, periodicity, authorship and dissemination efforts. Such design questions and associated outcomes are highly relevant for practitioners yet unaddressed in standard guidelines and most prior research that primarily concern content and conjectured reporting benefits. This article presents a framework suited to assessing real-life practices and outcomes. An exploratory evaluation in Amsterdam, Basel, Dublin, Freiburg, Nuremberg and Zurich suggests that sustainability reporting can benefit organizational change, management and communication yet also lead to ‘fatigue’ and discontinuation.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, integrated reporting, local governments, sustainability indicators, Sustainability reporting, GRI",
author = "Ludger Niemann and Thomas Hoppe",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal Special issue: Sustainable Public Management. Guest editors: Neil M. Boyd and Eric C. Martin",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14719037.2017.1293149",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "201--223",
journal = "Public management review",
issn = "1471-9037",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Sustainability reporting by local governments: a magic tool? Lessons on use and usefulness from European pioneers. / Niemann, Ludger (Corresponding Author); Hoppe, Thomas.

In: Public management review, Vol. 20, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 201-223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sustainability reporting by local governments: a magic tool?

T2 - Lessons on use and usefulness from European pioneers

AU - Niemann, Ludger

AU - Hoppe, Thomas

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal Special issue: Sustainable Public Management. Guest editors: Neil M. Boyd and Eric C. Martin

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - A growing number of city governments worldwide engage in sustainability reporting, voluntarily and responding to legal pressures. Diverse practices emerged based on unique choices concerning formats, periodicity, authorship and dissemination efforts. Such design questions and associated outcomes are highly relevant for practitioners yet unaddressed in standard guidelines and most prior research that primarily concern content and conjectured reporting benefits. This article presents a framework suited to assessing real-life practices and outcomes. An exploratory evaluation in Amsterdam, Basel, Dublin, Freiburg, Nuremberg and Zurich suggests that sustainability reporting can benefit organizational change, management and communication yet also lead to ‘fatigue’ and discontinuation.

AB - A growing number of city governments worldwide engage in sustainability reporting, voluntarily and responding to legal pressures. Diverse practices emerged based on unique choices concerning formats, periodicity, authorship and dissemination efforts. Such design questions and associated outcomes are highly relevant for practitioners yet unaddressed in standard guidelines and most prior research that primarily concern content and conjectured reporting benefits. This article presents a framework suited to assessing real-life practices and outcomes. An exploratory evaluation in Amsterdam, Basel, Dublin, Freiburg, Nuremberg and Zurich suggests that sustainability reporting can benefit organizational change, management and communication yet also lead to ‘fatigue’ and discontinuation.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - integrated reporting

KW - local governments

KW - sustainability indicators

KW - Sustainability reporting

KW - GRI

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014482931&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14719037.2017.1293149

DO - 10.1080/14719037.2017.1293149

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 201

EP - 223

JO - Public management review

JF - Public management review

SN - 1471-9037

IS - 1

ER -