System behaviour of a multiple overconstrained compliant four-bar mechanism

Werner W.P.J. Van De Sande; Ronald G.K.M. Aarts; Dannis M. Brouwer

System behaviour of a multiple overconstrained compliant four-bar mechanism

Werner W.P.J. Van De Sande, Ronald G.K.M. Aarts, Dannis M. Brouwer

University of Twente

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › Academic › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

205 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A method is proposed to identify the critical misalignment of a multiple overconstrained mechanism. This misalignment indicates the limit of desirable behaviour. The proposed method is compared with a multibody simulation of a compliant four-bar mechanism with three overconstraints. Subsequently, both analyses are compared to an experimental setup. The proposed method compares well to the multibody model. The proposed method and multibody simulation match qualitatively with measurements of the four-bar mechanism. However, the measured critical misalignments are about 30% larger in the experiment. As such, the proposed method is able to compute the critical misalignment of the four-bar mechanism.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings - ASPE 2015 Annual Meeting
Publisher	American Society for Precision Engineering
Pages	95-99
Number of pages	5
ISBN (Electronic)	9781887706698
Publication status	Published - 1 Nov 2015
Event	30th ASPE Annual Meeting 2015 - Hyatt Regency Austin, Austin, United States Duration: 1 Nov 2015 → 6 Nov 2015 Conference number: 30

Conference

Conference	30th ASPE Annual Meeting 2015
Country	United States
City	Austin
Period	1/11/15 → 6/11/15

Access to Document

4452

Cite this

@inproceedings{2606045d455f4a81b63d1f004587ac3f,

title = "System behaviour of a multiple overconstrained compliant four-bar mechanism",

abstract = "A method is proposed to identify the critical misalignment of a multiple overconstrained mechanism. This misalignment indicates the limit of desirable behaviour. The proposed method is compared with a multibody simulation of a compliant four-bar mechanism with three overconstraints. Subsequently, both analyses are compared to an experimental setup. The proposed method compares well to the multibody model. The proposed method and multibody simulation match qualitatively with measurements of the four-bar mechanism. However, the measured critical misalignments are about 30% larger in the experiment. As such, the proposed method is able to compute the critical misalignment of the four-bar mechanism.",

author = "{Van De Sande}, {Werner W.P.J.} and Aarts, {Ronald G.K.M.} and Brouwer, {Dannis M.}",

year = "2015",

month = nov,

day = "1",

language = "English",

pages = "95--99",

booktitle = "Proceedings - ASPE 2015 Annual Meeting",

publisher = "American Society for Precision Engineering",

address = "United States",

note = "30th ASPE Annual Meeting 2015 ; Conference date: 01-11-2015 Through 06-11-2015",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - System behaviour of a multiple overconstrained compliant four-bar mechanism

AU - Van De Sande, Werner W.P.J.

AU - Aarts, Ronald G.K.M.

AU - Brouwer, Dannis M.

N1 - Conference code: 30

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - A method is proposed to identify the critical misalignment of a multiple overconstrained mechanism. This misalignment indicates the limit of desirable behaviour. The proposed method is compared with a multibody simulation of a compliant four-bar mechanism with three overconstraints. Subsequently, both analyses are compared to an experimental setup. The proposed method compares well to the multibody model. The proposed method and multibody simulation match qualitatively with measurements of the four-bar mechanism. However, the measured critical misalignments are about 30% larger in the experiment. As such, the proposed method is able to compute the critical misalignment of the four-bar mechanism.

AB - A method is proposed to identify the critical misalignment of a multiple overconstrained mechanism. This misalignment indicates the limit of desirable behaviour. The proposed method is compared with a multibody simulation of a compliant four-bar mechanism with three overconstraints. Subsequently, both analyses are compared to an experimental setup. The proposed method compares well to the multibody model. The proposed method and multibody simulation match qualitatively with measurements of the four-bar mechanism. However, the measured critical misalignments are about 30% larger in the experiment. As such, the proposed method is able to compute the critical misalignment of the four-bar mechanism.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959892437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84959892437

SP - 95

EP - 99

BT - Proceedings - ASPE 2015 Annual Meeting

PB - American Society for Precision Engineering

T2 - 30th ASPE Annual Meeting 2015

Y2 - 1 November 2015 through 6 November 2015

ER -

System behaviour of a multiple overconstrained compliant four-bar mechanism

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this