Systematic review of design-based research progress: is a little knowledge a dangerous thing?

Susan McKenney, T.C. Reeves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Sufficient attention and resources have been allocated to design-based research (DBR) to warrant review concerning if and how its potential has been realized. Because the DBR literature clearly indicates that this type of research strives toward both the development of an intervention to address a problem in practice and empirical investigation yielding theoretical understanding that can inform the work of others, thoughtful assessment of DBR progress must devote substantial attention to each of these aspects. This requires an in-depth analysis of full-text reports of DBR, framed by a refined conceptualization of the intended outputs of DBR, and ideally, complemented by empirical investigation involving design-based research participants directly.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-100
JournalEducational researcher
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

resources
literature

Keywords

  • IR-85311
  • METIS-292351

Cite this

@article{6435ae9459384819963ae9da73cc2414,
title = "Systematic review of design-based research progress: is a little knowledge a dangerous thing?",
abstract = "Sufficient attention and resources have been allocated to design-based research (DBR) to warrant review concerning if and how its potential has been realized. Because the DBR literature clearly indicates that this type of research strives toward both the development of an intervention to address a problem in practice and empirical investigation yielding theoretical understanding that can inform the work of others, thoughtful assessment of DBR progress must devote substantial attention to each of these aspects. This requires an in-depth analysis of full-text reports of DBR, framed by a refined conceptualization of the intended outputs of DBR, and ideally, complemented by empirical investigation involving design-based research participants directly.",
keywords = "IR-85311, METIS-292351",
author = "Susan McKenney and T.C. Reeves",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.3102/0013189X12463781",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "97--100",
journal = "Educational researcher",
issn = "0013-189X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

Systematic review of design-based research progress: is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? / McKenney, Susan; Reeves, T.C.

In: Educational researcher, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2013, p. 97-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of design-based research progress: is a little knowledge a dangerous thing?

AU - McKenney, Susan

AU - Reeves, T.C.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Sufficient attention and resources have been allocated to design-based research (DBR) to warrant review concerning if and how its potential has been realized. Because the DBR literature clearly indicates that this type of research strives toward both the development of an intervention to address a problem in practice and empirical investigation yielding theoretical understanding that can inform the work of others, thoughtful assessment of DBR progress must devote substantial attention to each of these aspects. This requires an in-depth analysis of full-text reports of DBR, framed by a refined conceptualization of the intended outputs of DBR, and ideally, complemented by empirical investigation involving design-based research participants directly.

AB - Sufficient attention and resources have been allocated to design-based research (DBR) to warrant review concerning if and how its potential has been realized. Because the DBR literature clearly indicates that this type of research strives toward both the development of an intervention to address a problem in practice and empirical investigation yielding theoretical understanding that can inform the work of others, thoughtful assessment of DBR progress must devote substantial attention to each of these aspects. This requires an in-depth analysis of full-text reports of DBR, framed by a refined conceptualization of the intended outputs of DBR, and ideally, complemented by empirical investigation involving design-based research participants directly.

KW - IR-85311

KW - METIS-292351

U2 - 10.3102/0013189X12463781

DO - 10.3102/0013189X12463781

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 97

EP - 100

JO - Educational researcher

JF - Educational researcher

SN - 0013-189X

IS - 2

ER -