Abstract
The vast amount of previous research on project management competence does not provide a basis for educational needs. Analyzing previous research poses two challenges: the lack of a uniform list of competences, necessitating a taxonomy, and the use of importance as a criterion, favoring general important competences. Criticality is introduced as the competence a project manager adds to the team. Validation research using criticality and the taxonomy among experienced Dutch project managers is more comprehensive and provides a lesser focus on general important competences than previous research. Criticality focuses more on the essence of the profession.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 62-81 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Project Management Journal |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Jun 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Competence research
- Criticality
- Project management competences
- Project management education
- Taxonomy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Tackling Project Management Competence Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver