Taking the patient and the patient's perspective into account to improve outcomes of care of patients with musculoskeletal diseases

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used in the assessment of patients with musculoskeletal diseases. The present review provides an overview of historic and recent developments, including core set recommendations for assessing patient-reported outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. The evidence supporting commonly used patient-reported outcomes measures is reviewed. Furthermore, various methodological approaches that can be utilized to evaluate validity and measurement precision of patient reported outcomes are introduced. Commonly used methods based on the classical test theory as well as modern approaches based on item response theory will be discussed. The review finally describes the increasing use of item response theory-based approaches used in patient-reported outcomes assessment in the musculoskeletal diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Article number101436
JournalBest Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Musculoskeletal Diseases
Patient Care
Patient Outcome Assessment
Psoriatic Arthritis
Fibromyalgia
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Osteoarthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Item response theory
  • Outcomes
  • Patient reported outcomes
  • Reliability
  • Validity
  • Item banking

Cite this

@article{91a5159ac33648a1856588eeaf1b26c2,
title = "Taking the patient and the patient's perspective into account to improve outcomes of care of patients with musculoskeletal diseases",
abstract = "Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used in the assessment of patients with musculoskeletal diseases. The present review provides an overview of historic and recent developments, including core set recommendations for assessing patient-reported outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. The evidence supporting commonly used patient-reported outcomes measures is reviewed. Furthermore, various methodological approaches that can be utilized to evaluate validity and measurement precision of patient reported outcomes are introduced. Commonly used methods based on the classical test theory as well as modern approaches based on item response theory will be discussed. The review finally describes the increasing use of item response theory-based approaches used in patient-reported outcomes assessment in the musculoskeletal diseases.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, Item response theory, Outcomes, Patient reported outcomes, Reliability, Validity, Item banking",
author = "{Oude Voshaar}, {Martijn A.H.} and {van de Laar}, {Mart A.F.J.}",
note = "Elsevier deal",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.berh.2019.101436",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
journal = "Best practice & research in clinical rheumatology",
issn = "1521-6942",
publisher = "Bailliere Tindall Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Taking the patient and the patient's perspective into account to improve outcomes of care of patients with musculoskeletal diseases

AU - Oude Voshaar, Martijn A.H.

AU - van de Laar, Mart A.F.J.

N1 - Elsevier deal

PY - 2019/9/6

Y1 - 2019/9/6

N2 - Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used in the assessment of patients with musculoskeletal diseases. The present review provides an overview of historic and recent developments, including core set recommendations for assessing patient-reported outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. The evidence supporting commonly used patient-reported outcomes measures is reviewed. Furthermore, various methodological approaches that can be utilized to evaluate validity and measurement precision of patient reported outcomes are introduced. Commonly used methods based on the classical test theory as well as modern approaches based on item response theory will be discussed. The review finally describes the increasing use of item response theory-based approaches used in patient-reported outcomes assessment in the musculoskeletal diseases.

AB - Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used in the assessment of patients with musculoskeletal diseases. The present review provides an overview of historic and recent developments, including core set recommendations for assessing patient-reported outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. The evidence supporting commonly used patient-reported outcomes measures is reviewed. Furthermore, various methodological approaches that can be utilized to evaluate validity and measurement precision of patient reported outcomes are introduced. Commonly used methods based on the classical test theory as well as modern approaches based on item response theory will be discussed. The review finally describes the increasing use of item response theory-based approaches used in patient-reported outcomes assessment in the musculoskeletal diseases.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - Item response theory

KW - Outcomes

KW - Patient reported outcomes

KW - Reliability

KW - Validity

KW - Item banking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071885066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.berh.2019.101436

DO - 10.1016/j.berh.2019.101436

M3 - Review article

VL - 33

JO - Best practice & research in clinical rheumatology

JF - Best practice & research in clinical rheumatology

SN - 1521-6942

IS - 3

M1 - 101436

ER -