Teaching Process Design – Quo Vadis?

Daniel R. Lewin, Thomas A. Adams, Dominik Bongartz, Grégoire Léonard, Seyed Soheil Mansouri, Fernando G. Martins, Iqbal I. Mujtaba, Edwin Zondervan

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The capstone course in chemical process design, together with its associated design project is the acid test to gauge the mastery of trainee chemical engineers. There is no other component in the chemical engineering curriculum that performs this function to this degree. This paper presents the results of an international survey to investigate the current teaching practices with regards to instruction in chemical process design. The results indicate that virtually all capstone courses have substantial group-based design projects. Process simulation is used extensively, while the targeted technical skills are often still classical design and economic evaluation techniques. Heat integration is also very highly considered (93% of respondents) perhaps reflecting awareness of global energy issues. Interestingly, the way teaching session time is distributed between activities (e.g. lecturing versus active learning techniques) falls into a clear bimodal distribution, reflecting distinct teaching philosophies and styles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3505-3510
Number of pages6
JournalComputer Aided Chemical Engineering
Volume53
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Event34th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering and 15th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering - Florence, Italy
Duration: 2 Jun 20246 Jun 2024
Conference number: 34

Keywords

  • NLA
  • Capstone design
  • Design project
  • Process design instruction
  • Active learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Teaching Process Design – Quo Vadis?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this