Textural features of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning in diagnosing aortic prosthetic graft infection

Ben R. Saleem, Roelof J. Beukinga, Ronald Boellaard, Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans, Michel M.P.J. Reijnen, Clark J. Zeebregts, Riemer H.J.A. Slart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The clinical problem in suspected aortoiliac graft infection (AGI) is to obtain proof of infection. Although 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography scanning (PET) has been suggested to play a pivotal role, an evidence-based interpretation is lacking. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the feasibility and utility of 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity characterized by textural features to diagnose AGI.

Methods: Thirty patients with a history of aortic graft reconstruction who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning were included. Sixteen patients were suspected to have an AGI (group I). AGI was considered proven only in the case of a positive bacterial culture. Positive cultures were found in 10 of the 16 patients (group Ia), and in the other six patients, cultures remained negative (group Ib). A control group was formed of 14 patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET for other reasons (group II). PET images were assessed using conventional maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tissue-to-background ratio (TBR), and visual grading scale (VGS). Additionally, 64 different 18F-FDG PET based textural features were applied to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity. To select candidate predictors, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed (α = 0.16). The accuracy was satisfactory in case of an AUC > 0.8.

Results: The feature selection process yielded the textural features named variance (AUC = 0.88), high grey level zone emphasis (AUC = 0.87), small zone low grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.80), and small zone high grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.81) most optimal for distinguishing between groups I and II. SUVmax, TBR, and VGS were also able to distinguish between these groups with AUCs of 0.87, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The textural feature named short run high grey level emphasis was able to distinguish group Ia from Ib (AUC = 0.83), while for the same task the TBR and VGS were not found to be predictive. SUVmax was found predictive in distinguishing these groups, but showed an unsatisfactory accuracy (AUC = 0.75).

Conclusion: Textural analysis to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity is feasible and shows promising results in diagnosing AGI, but requires additional external validation and refinement before it can be implemented in the clinical decision-making process.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)886-894
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
Volume44
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017

Fingerprint

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Positron-Emission Tomography
Area Under Curve
Transplants
Infection
Retrospective Studies
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Control Groups

Keywords

  • F-FDG PET
  • Aortic prosthetic graft infection
  • Textural features

Cite this

@article{dae544e4cc5c45dbbcd46c9e5156f9c7,
title = "Textural features of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning in diagnosing aortic prosthetic graft infection",
abstract = "Background: The clinical problem in suspected aortoiliac graft infection (AGI) is to obtain proof of infection. Although 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography scanning (PET) has been suggested to play a pivotal role, an evidence-based interpretation is lacking. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the feasibility and utility of 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity characterized by textural features to diagnose AGI.Methods: Thirty patients with a history of aortic graft reconstruction who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning were included. Sixteen patients were suspected to have an AGI (group I). AGI was considered proven only in the case of a positive bacterial culture. Positive cultures were found in 10 of the 16 patients (group Ia), and in the other six patients, cultures remained negative (group Ib). A control group was formed of 14 patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET for other reasons (group II). PET images were assessed using conventional maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tissue-to-background ratio (TBR), and visual grading scale (VGS). Additionally, 64 different 18F-FDG PET based textural features were applied to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity. To select candidate predictors, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed (α = 0.16). The accuracy was satisfactory in case of an AUC > 0.8.Results: The feature selection process yielded the textural features named variance (AUC = 0.88), high grey level zone emphasis (AUC = 0.87), small zone low grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.80), and small zone high grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.81) most optimal for distinguishing between groups I and II. SUVmax, TBR, and VGS were also able to distinguish between these groups with AUCs of 0.87, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The textural feature named short run high grey level emphasis was able to distinguish group Ia from Ib (AUC = 0.83), while for the same task the TBR and VGS were not found to be predictive. SUVmax was found predictive in distinguishing these groups, but showed an unsatisfactory accuracy (AUC = 0.75).Conclusion: Textural analysis to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity is feasible and shows promising results in diagnosing AGI, but requires additional external validation and refinement before it can be implemented in the clinical decision-making process.",
keywords = "F-FDG PET, Aortic prosthetic graft infection, Textural features",
author = "Saleem, {Ben R.} and Beukinga, {Roelof J.} and Ronald Boellaard and Glaudemans, {Andor W.J.M.} and Reijnen, {Michel M.P.J.} and Zeebregts, {Clark J.} and Slart, {Riemer H.J.A.}",
note = "Open Access",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00259-016-3599-7",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "886--894",
journal = "European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging",
issn = "1619-7070",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

Textural features of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning in diagnosing aortic prosthetic graft infection. / Saleem, Ben R.; Beukinga, Roelof J.; Boellaard, Ronald; Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M.; Reijnen, Michel M.P.J.; Zeebregts, Clark J.; Slart, Riemer H.J.A.

In: European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, Vol. 44, No. 5, 01.05.2017, p. 886-894.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Textural features of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scanning in diagnosing aortic prosthetic graft infection

AU - Saleem, Ben R.

AU - Beukinga, Roelof J.

AU - Boellaard, Ronald

AU - Glaudemans, Andor W.J.M.

AU - Reijnen, Michel M.P.J.

AU - Zeebregts, Clark J.

AU - Slart, Riemer H.J.A.

N1 - Open Access

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Background: The clinical problem in suspected aortoiliac graft infection (AGI) is to obtain proof of infection. Although 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography scanning (PET) has been suggested to play a pivotal role, an evidence-based interpretation is lacking. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the feasibility and utility of 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity characterized by textural features to diagnose AGI.Methods: Thirty patients with a history of aortic graft reconstruction who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning were included. Sixteen patients were suspected to have an AGI (group I). AGI was considered proven only in the case of a positive bacterial culture. Positive cultures were found in 10 of the 16 patients (group Ia), and in the other six patients, cultures remained negative (group Ib). A control group was formed of 14 patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET for other reasons (group II). PET images were assessed using conventional maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tissue-to-background ratio (TBR), and visual grading scale (VGS). Additionally, 64 different 18F-FDG PET based textural features were applied to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity. To select candidate predictors, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed (α = 0.16). The accuracy was satisfactory in case of an AUC > 0.8.Results: The feature selection process yielded the textural features named variance (AUC = 0.88), high grey level zone emphasis (AUC = 0.87), small zone low grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.80), and small zone high grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.81) most optimal for distinguishing between groups I and II. SUVmax, TBR, and VGS were also able to distinguish between these groups with AUCs of 0.87, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The textural feature named short run high grey level emphasis was able to distinguish group Ia from Ib (AUC = 0.83), while for the same task the TBR and VGS were not found to be predictive. SUVmax was found predictive in distinguishing these groups, but showed an unsatisfactory accuracy (AUC = 0.75).Conclusion: Textural analysis to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity is feasible and shows promising results in diagnosing AGI, but requires additional external validation and refinement before it can be implemented in the clinical decision-making process.

AB - Background: The clinical problem in suspected aortoiliac graft infection (AGI) is to obtain proof of infection. Although 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography scanning (PET) has been suggested to play a pivotal role, an evidence-based interpretation is lacking. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the feasibility and utility of 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity characterized by textural features to diagnose AGI.Methods: Thirty patients with a history of aortic graft reconstruction who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning were included. Sixteen patients were suspected to have an AGI (group I). AGI was considered proven only in the case of a positive bacterial culture. Positive cultures were found in 10 of the 16 patients (group Ia), and in the other six patients, cultures remained negative (group Ib). A control group was formed of 14 patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET for other reasons (group II). PET images were assessed using conventional maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tissue-to-background ratio (TBR), and visual grading scale (VGS). Additionally, 64 different 18F-FDG PET based textural features were applied to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity. To select candidate predictors, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed (α = 0.16). The accuracy was satisfactory in case of an AUC > 0.8.Results: The feature selection process yielded the textural features named variance (AUC = 0.88), high grey level zone emphasis (AUC = 0.87), small zone low grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.80), and small zone high grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.81) most optimal for distinguishing between groups I and II. SUVmax, TBR, and VGS were also able to distinguish between these groups with AUCs of 0.87, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The textural feature named short run high grey level emphasis was able to distinguish group Ia from Ib (AUC = 0.83), while for the same task the TBR and VGS were not found to be predictive. SUVmax was found predictive in distinguishing these groups, but showed an unsatisfactory accuracy (AUC = 0.75).Conclusion: Textural analysis to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity is feasible and shows promising results in diagnosing AGI, but requires additional external validation and refinement before it can be implemented in the clinical decision-making process.

KW - F-FDG PET

KW - Aortic prosthetic graft infection

KW - Textural features

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007241798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00259-016-3599-7

DO - 10.1007/s00259-016-3599-7

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 886

EP - 894

JO - European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging

JF - European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging

SN - 1619-7070

IS - 5

ER -