Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The ACROBAT 2022 challenge: Automatic registration of breast cancer tissue

  • Philippe Weitz*
  • , Masi Valkonen
  • , Leslie Solorzano
  • , Circe Carr
  • , Kimmo Kartasalo
  • , Constance Boissin
  • , Sonja Koivukoski
  • , Aino Kuusela
  • , Dusan Rasic
  • , Yanbo Feng
  • , Sandra Sinius Pouplier
  • , Abhinav Sharma
  • , Kajsa Ledesma Eriksson
  • , Stephanie Robertson
  • , Christian Marzahl
  • , Chandler D. Gatenbee
  • , Alexander R.A. Anderson
  • , Marek Wodzinski
  • , Artur Jurgas
  • , Niccolò Marini
  • Manfredo Atzori, Henning Müller, Daniel Budelmann, Nick Weiss, Stefan Heldmann, Johannes Lotz, Jelmer M. Wolterink, Bruno De Santi, Abhijeet Patil, Amit Sethi, Satoshi Kondo, Satoshi Kasai, Kousuke Hirasawa, Mahtab Farrokh, Neeraj Kumar, Russell Greiner, Leena Latonen, Anne Vibeke Laenkholm, Johan Hartman, Pekka Ruusuvuori, Mattias Rantalainen
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › Academic › peer-review

334 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The alignment of tissue between histopathological whole-slide-images (WSI) is crucial for research and clinical applications. Advances in computing, deep learning, and availability of large WSI datasets have revolutionised WSI analysis. Therefore, the current state-of-the-art in WSI registration is unclear. To address this, we conducted the ACROBAT challenge, based on the largest WSI registration dataset to date, including 4,212 WSIs from 1,152 breast cancer patients. The challenge objective was to align WSIs of tissue that was stained with routine diagnostic immunohistochemistry to its H&E-stained counterpart. We compare the performance of eight WSI registration algorithms, including an investigation of the impact of different WSI properties and clinical covariates. We find that conceptually distinct WSI registration methods can lead to highly accurate registration performances and identify covariates that impact performances across methods. These results provide a comparison of the performance of current WSI registration methods and guide researchers in selecting and developing methods.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103257
JournalMedical image analysis
Volume97
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Computational pathology
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Whole-slide-image registration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ACROBAT 2022 challenge: Automatic registration of breast cancer tissue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • The ACROBAT 2022 Challenge: Automatic Registration Of Breast Cancer Tissue

    Weitz, P., Valkonen, M., Solorzano, L., Carr, C., Kartasalo, K., Boissin, C., Koivukoski, S., Kuusela, A., Rasic, D., Feng, Y., Pouplier, S. S., Sharma, A., Eriksson, K. L., Robertson, S., Marzahl, C., Gatenbee, C. D., Anderson, A. R. A., Wodzinski, M., Jurgas, A. & Marini, N. & 21 others, Atzori, M., Müller, H., Budelmann, D., Weiss, N., Heldmann, S., Lotz, J., Wolterink, J. M., Santi, B. D., Patil, A., Sethi, A., Kondo, S., Kasai, S., Hirasawa, K., Farrokh, M., Kumar, N., Greiner, R., Latonen, L., Laenkholm, A.-V., Hartman, J., Ruusuvuori, P. & Rantalainen, M., 29 May 2023, ArXiv.org.

    Research output: Working paper › Preprint › Academic

    Open Access
    File
    34 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this