The added value of system robustness analysis for flood risk management

M.J.P. Mens, F. Klijn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Decision makers in fluvial flood risk management increasingly acknowledge that they have to prepare for extreme events. Flood risk is the most common basis on which to compare flood risk-reducing strategies. To take uncertainties into account the criteria of robustness and flexibility are advocated as well. This paper discusses the added value of robustness as additional decision criterion compared to single-value flood risk only. We do so by quantifying flood risk and system robustness for alternative system configurations of the Ijssel River valley in the Netherlands. We found that robustness analysis has added value in three respects: (1) it does not require assumptions on current and future flood probabilities, since flood consequences are shown as a function of discharge, (2) it shows the sensitivity of the system to varying discharges and (3) it supports a discussion on the acceptability of flood damage. We conclude that robustness analysis is a valuable addition to flood risk analysis in support of long-term decision-making on flood risk management
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2913-2945
JournalNatural hazards and earth systems sciences discussions
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

systems analysis
risk management
flood damage
extreme event
decision making
valley
river

Keywords

  • METIS-303429
  • IR-91185

Cite this

@article{03a9747490354c29be9ee492b6cf54c5,
title = "The added value of system robustness analysis for flood risk management",
abstract = "Decision makers in fluvial flood risk management increasingly acknowledge that they have to prepare for extreme events. Flood risk is the most common basis on which to compare flood risk-reducing strategies. To take uncertainties into account the criteria of robustness and flexibility are advocated as well. This paper discusses the added value of robustness as additional decision criterion compared to single-value flood risk only. We do so by quantifying flood risk and system robustness for alternative system configurations of the Ijssel River valley in the Netherlands. We found that robustness analysis has added value in three respects: (1) it does not require assumptions on current and future flood probabilities, since flood consequences are shown as a function of discharge, (2) it shows the sensitivity of the system to varying discharges and (3) it supports a discussion on the acceptability of flood damage. We conclude that robustness analysis is a valuable addition to flood risk analysis in support of long-term decision-making on flood risk management",
keywords = "METIS-303429, IR-91185",
author = "M.J.P. Mens and F. Klijn",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5194/nhessd-2-2913-2014",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "2913--2945",
journal = "Natural hazards and earth systems sciences discussions",
issn = "2195-9269",
publisher = "Copernicus",
number = "4",

}

The added value of system robustness analysis for flood risk management. / Mens, M.J.P.; Klijn, F.

In: Natural hazards and earth systems sciences discussions, Vol. 2, No. 4, 2014, p. 2913-2945.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The added value of system robustness analysis for flood risk management

AU - Mens, M.J.P.

AU - Klijn, F.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Decision makers in fluvial flood risk management increasingly acknowledge that they have to prepare for extreme events. Flood risk is the most common basis on which to compare flood risk-reducing strategies. To take uncertainties into account the criteria of robustness and flexibility are advocated as well. This paper discusses the added value of robustness as additional decision criterion compared to single-value flood risk only. We do so by quantifying flood risk and system robustness for alternative system configurations of the Ijssel River valley in the Netherlands. We found that robustness analysis has added value in three respects: (1) it does not require assumptions on current and future flood probabilities, since flood consequences are shown as a function of discharge, (2) it shows the sensitivity of the system to varying discharges and (3) it supports a discussion on the acceptability of flood damage. We conclude that robustness analysis is a valuable addition to flood risk analysis in support of long-term decision-making on flood risk management

AB - Decision makers in fluvial flood risk management increasingly acknowledge that they have to prepare for extreme events. Flood risk is the most common basis on which to compare flood risk-reducing strategies. To take uncertainties into account the criteria of robustness and flexibility are advocated as well. This paper discusses the added value of robustness as additional decision criterion compared to single-value flood risk only. We do so by quantifying flood risk and system robustness for alternative system configurations of the Ijssel River valley in the Netherlands. We found that robustness analysis has added value in three respects: (1) it does not require assumptions on current and future flood probabilities, since flood consequences are shown as a function of discharge, (2) it shows the sensitivity of the system to varying discharges and (3) it supports a discussion on the acceptability of flood damage. We conclude that robustness analysis is a valuable addition to flood risk analysis in support of long-term decision-making on flood risk management

KW - METIS-303429

KW - IR-91185

U2 - 10.5194/nhessd-2-2913-2014

DO - 10.5194/nhessd-2-2913-2014

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 2913

EP - 2945

JO - Natural hazards and earth systems sciences discussions

JF - Natural hazards and earth systems sciences discussions

SN - 2195-9269

IS - 4

ER -