The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders' Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing

Femke Nijboer, Jens Clausen, Brendan Z. Allison, Pim Haselager

  • 18 Citations

Abstract

Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4th International BCI conference, which took place in May–June 2010 in Asilomar, California. We assessed respondents’ opinions about a number of topics. First, we investigated preferences for terminology and definitions relating to BCIs. Second, we assessed respondents’ expectations on the marketability of different BCI applications (BCIs for healthy people, BCIs for assistive technology, BCIs-controlled neuroprostheses and BCIs as therapy tools). Third, we investigated opinions about ethical issues related to BCI research for the development of assistive technology: informed consent process with locked-in patients, risk-benefit analyses, team responsibility, consequences of BCI on patients’ and families’ lives, liability and personal identity and interaction with the media. Finally, we asked respondents which issues are urgent in BCI research.
Original languageUndefined
Pages (from-to)541-578
Number of pages38
JournalNeuroethics
Volumeonline pre
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Brain-Computer Interfaces
Self-Help Devices
Ethics
Legal Liability
Informed Consent

Keywords

  • brain-machine interface
  • locked-in syndrome
  • EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP7/248320
  • EWI-20680
  • Brain-Computer Interface
  • HMI-HF: Human Factors
  • Neuroethics
  • METIS-279663
  • IR-78303
  • BSS-Neurotechnology and cellular engineering

Cite this

Nijboer, F., Clausen, J., Allison, B. Z., & Haselager, P. (2013). The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders' Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing. Neuroethics, online pre(3), 541-578. DOI: 10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6

Nijboer, Femke; Clausen, Jens; Allison, Brendan Z.; Haselager, Pim / The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders' Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing.

In: Neuroethics, Vol. online pre, No. 3, 2013, p. 541-578.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

@article{141e30487b1e46eba34c0b4c323561ef,
title = "The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders' Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing",
abstract = "Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4th International BCI conference, which took place in May–June 2010 in Asilomar, California. We assessed respondents’ opinions about a number of topics. First, we investigated preferences for terminology and definitions relating to BCIs. Second, we assessed respondents’ expectations on the marketability of different BCI applications (BCIs for healthy people, BCIs for assistive technology, BCIs-controlled neuroprostheses and BCIs as therapy tools). Third, we investigated opinions about ethical issues related to BCI research for the development of assistive technology: informed consent process with locked-in patients, risk-benefit analyses, team responsibility, consequences of BCI on patients’ and families’ lives, liability and personal identity and interaction with the media. Finally, we asked respondents which issues are urgent in BCI research.",
keywords = "brain-machine interface, locked-in syndrome, EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP7/248320, EWI-20680, Brain-Computer Interface, HMI-HF: Human Factors, Neuroethics, METIS-279663, IR-78303, BSS-Neurotechnology and cellular engineering",
author = "Femke Nijboer and Jens Clausen and Allison, {Brendan Z.} and Pim Haselager",
note = "Open Access",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6",
volume = "online pre",
pages = "541--578",
journal = "Neuroethics",
issn = "1874-5490",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

Nijboer, F, Clausen, J, Allison, BZ & Haselager, P 2013, 'The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders' Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing' Neuroethics, vol online pre, no. 3, pp. 541-578. DOI: 10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6

The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders' Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing. / Nijboer, Femke; Clausen, Jens; Allison, Brendan Z.; Haselager, Pim.

In: Neuroethics, Vol. online pre, No. 3, 2013, p. 541-578.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders' Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing

AU - Nijboer,Femke

AU - Clausen,Jens

AU - Allison,Brendan Z.

AU - Haselager,Pim

N1 - Open Access

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4th International BCI conference, which took place in May–June 2010 in Asilomar, California. We assessed respondents’ opinions about a number of topics. First, we investigated preferences for terminology and definitions relating to BCIs. Second, we assessed respondents’ expectations on the marketability of different BCI applications (BCIs for healthy people, BCIs for assistive technology, BCIs-controlled neuroprostheses and BCIs as therapy tools). Third, we investigated opinions about ethical issues related to BCI research for the development of assistive technology: informed consent process with locked-in patients, risk-benefit analyses, team responsibility, consequences of BCI on patients’ and families’ lives, liability and personal identity and interaction with the media. Finally, we asked respondents which issues are urgent in BCI research.

AB - Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) research and (future) applications raise important ethical issues that need to be addressed to promote societal acceptance and adequate policies. Here we report on a survey we conducted among 145 BCI researchers at the 4th International BCI conference, which took place in May–June 2010 in Asilomar, California. We assessed respondents’ opinions about a number of topics. First, we investigated preferences for terminology and definitions relating to BCIs. Second, we assessed respondents’ expectations on the marketability of different BCI applications (BCIs for healthy people, BCIs for assistive technology, BCIs-controlled neuroprostheses and BCIs as therapy tools). Third, we investigated opinions about ethical issues related to BCI research for the development of assistive technology: informed consent process with locked-in patients, risk-benefit analyses, team responsibility, consequences of BCI on patients’ and families’ lives, liability and personal identity and interaction with the media. Finally, we asked respondents which issues are urgent in BCI research.

KW - brain-machine interface

KW - locked-in syndrome

KW - EC Grant Agreement nr.: FP7/248320

KW - EWI-20680

KW - Brain-Computer Interface

KW - HMI-HF: Human Factors

KW - Neuroethics

KW - METIS-279663

KW - IR-78303

KW - BSS-Neurotechnology and cellular engineering

U2 - 10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6

DO - 10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6

M3 - Article

VL - online pre

SP - 541

EP - 578

JO - Neuroethics

T2 - Neuroethics

JF - Neuroethics

SN - 1874-5490

IS - 3

ER -

Nijboer F, Clausen J, Allison BZ, Haselager P. The Asilomar Survey: Stakeholders' Opinions on Ethical Issues Related to Brain-Computer Interfacing. Neuroethics. 2013;online pre(3):541-578. Available from, DOI: 10.1007/s12152-011-9132-6