The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing

Feni Kontogianni (Corresponding Author), Lorraine Hope, Paul J. Taylor, Aldert Vrij, Fiona Gabbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Obtaining detailed accounts from individuals who have witnessed complex events under challenging encoding conditions presents a difficulty for investigators. In the present research, participants (N = 132) reported their recall of an event witnessed under full or divided attention using a timeline reporting format. Extending the timeline technique to assess the relative performance of two additional mnemonics—self-generated cues (SGC) and other-generated cues (OGC)—participants provided an account across three timeline reporting conditions comparing the efficacy of SGC, OGC, and no cues (control). Mock-witnesses using SGC provided more correct details than mock-witnesses in the OGC or no-cues conditions, under full but not under divided attention conditions. There was no difference between cue conditions with respect to the number of errors reported across attention conditions. Findings show SGC to be a promising addition to interviewing techniques as a retrieval support mnemonic with implications for applied contexts.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)454-461
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
Volume7
Issue number3
Early online date21 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Cues
TimeLine
Research Personnel
Research

Keywords

  • Cognitive mnemonics
  • Divided attention
  • Information gathering
  • Memory retrieval
  • Self-Generated Cues
  • Timeline

Cite this

Kontogianni, Feni ; Hope, Lorraine ; Taylor, Paul J. ; Vrij, Aldert ; Gabbert, Fiona. / The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing. In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2018 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 454-461.
@article{a83f4605ccfc4e2e9972736db541b513,
title = "The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing",
abstract = "Obtaining detailed accounts from individuals who have witnessed complex events under challenging encoding conditions presents a difficulty for investigators. In the present research, participants (N = 132) reported their recall of an event witnessed under full or divided attention using a timeline reporting format. Extending the timeline technique to assess the relative performance of two additional mnemonics—self-generated cues (SGC) and other-generated cues (OGC)—participants provided an account across three timeline reporting conditions comparing the efficacy of SGC, OGC, and no cues (control). Mock-witnesses using SGC provided more correct details than mock-witnesses in the OGC or no-cues conditions, under full but not under divided attention conditions. There was no difference between cue conditions with respect to the number of errors reported across attention conditions. Findings show SGC to be a promising addition to interviewing techniques as a retrieval support mnemonic with implications for applied contexts.",
keywords = "Cognitive mnemonics, Divided attention, Information gathering, Memory retrieval, Self-Generated Cues, Timeline",
author = "Feni Kontogianni and Lorraine Hope and Taylor, {Paul J.} and Aldert Vrij and Fiona Gabbert",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "454--461",
journal = "Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition",
issn = "2211-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing. / Kontogianni, Feni (Corresponding Author); Hope, Lorraine; Taylor, Paul J.; Vrij, Aldert; Gabbert, Fiona.

In: Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 454-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing

AU - Kontogianni, Feni

AU - Hope, Lorraine

AU - Taylor, Paul J.

AU - Vrij, Aldert

AU - Gabbert, Fiona

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Obtaining detailed accounts from individuals who have witnessed complex events under challenging encoding conditions presents a difficulty for investigators. In the present research, participants (N = 132) reported their recall of an event witnessed under full or divided attention using a timeline reporting format. Extending the timeline technique to assess the relative performance of two additional mnemonics—self-generated cues (SGC) and other-generated cues (OGC)—participants provided an account across three timeline reporting conditions comparing the efficacy of SGC, OGC, and no cues (control). Mock-witnesses using SGC provided more correct details than mock-witnesses in the OGC or no-cues conditions, under full but not under divided attention conditions. There was no difference between cue conditions with respect to the number of errors reported across attention conditions. Findings show SGC to be a promising addition to interviewing techniques as a retrieval support mnemonic with implications for applied contexts.

AB - Obtaining detailed accounts from individuals who have witnessed complex events under challenging encoding conditions presents a difficulty for investigators. In the present research, participants (N = 132) reported their recall of an event witnessed under full or divided attention using a timeline reporting format. Extending the timeline technique to assess the relative performance of two additional mnemonics—self-generated cues (SGC) and other-generated cues (OGC)—participants provided an account across three timeline reporting conditions comparing the efficacy of SGC, OGC, and no cues (control). Mock-witnesses using SGC provided more correct details than mock-witnesses in the OGC or no-cues conditions, under full but not under divided attention conditions. There was no difference between cue conditions with respect to the number of errors reported across attention conditions. Findings show SGC to be a promising addition to interviewing techniques as a retrieval support mnemonic with implications for applied contexts.

KW - Cognitive mnemonics

KW - Divided attention

KW - Information gathering

KW - Memory retrieval

KW - Self-Generated Cues

KW - Timeline

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045726974&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 454

EP - 461

JO - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

SN - 2211-3681

IS - 3

ER -