TY - JOUR
T1 - The Climatic Impact-Driver Framework for Assessment of Risk-Relevant Climate Information
AU - Ruane, Alex C.
AU - Vautard, Robert
AU - Ranasinghe, Roshanka
AU - Sillmann, Jana
AU - Coppola, Erika
AU - Arnell, Nigel
AU - Cruz, Faye Abigail
AU - Dessai, Suraje
AU - Iles, Carley E.
AU - Islam, A. K.M.Saiful
AU - Jones, Richard G.
AU - Rahimi, Mohammad
AU - Carrascal, Daniel Ruiz
AU - Seneviratne, Sonia I.
AU - Servonnat, Jérôme
AU - Sörensson, Anna A.
AU - Sylla, Mouhamadou Bamba
AU - Tebaldi, Claudia
AU - Wang, Wen
AU - Zaaboul, Rashyd
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are grateful for many interactions and suggestions from the IPCC Working Group I author and leadership team (particularly Valerie Masson‐Delmotte, Panmao Zhai, Carolina Vera, Xuebin Zhang, Friederike Otto, Maisa Rojas, Alessandro Dosio, Sarah Connors and Anna Pirani). We would also like to thank the authors from the many WG II chapters for input on the CID framework and definitions and from WG III, and in particular those involved coordinating the cross‐Working Group activities (Chris Lennard, Brian O’Neill, Andreas Fischlin and Andy Reisinger). Development of the CID Framework was also facilitated by the WGI Chapter 12 Review Editors (David Karoly, Edvin Aldrian and Murat Türkeş) and helpful suggestions by Tim Carter through the review process. Thanks also to IPCC authors who provided CID translation suggestions (Bart van den Hurk, June‐Yi Lee, Fatima Driouech) and to two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions. ACR contributions were made possible by NASA Community Service and Earth Sciences Division GISS Climate Impacts Group support. CT was supported by the CASCADE project funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is operated by the US Department of Energy (contract no. DE340AC02‐05CH11231). RGJ was supported by the Hadley Centre Climate Programme funded by UK Government departments BEIS and Defra.
Funding Information:
The authors are grateful for many interactions and suggestions from the IPCC Working Group I author and leadership team (particularly Valerie Masson-Delmotte, Panmao Zhai, Carolina Vera, Xuebin Zhang, Friederike Otto, Maisa Rojas, Alessandro Dosio, Sarah Connors and Anna Pirani). We would also like to thank the authors from the many WG II chapters for input on the CID framework and definitions and from WG III, and in particular those involved coordinating the cross-Working Group activities (Chris Lennard, Brian O’Neill, Andreas Fischlin and Andy Reisinger). Development of the CID Framework was also facilitated by the WGI Chapter 12 Review Editors (David Karoly, Edvin Aldrian and Murat Türkeş) and helpful suggestions by Tim Carter through the review process. Thanks also to IPCC authors who provided CID translation suggestions (Bart van den Hurk, June-Yi Lee, Fatima Driouech) and to two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions. ACR contributions were made possible by NASA Community Service and Earth Sciences Division GISS Climate Impacts Group support. CT was supported by the CASCADE project funded by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is operated by the US Department of Energy (contract no. DE340AC02-05CH11231). RGJ was supported by the Hadley Centre Climate Programme funded by UK Government departments BEIS and Defra.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Crown copyright and The Authors. This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the King's Printer for Scotland. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
PY - 2022/11/4
Y1 - 2022/11/4
N2 - The climate science and applications communities need a broad and demand-driven concept to assess physical climate conditions that are relevant for impacts on human and natural systems. Here, we augment the description of the “climatic impact-driver” (CID) approach adopted in the Working Group I (WGI) contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report. CIDs are broadly defined as “physical climate system conditions (e.g., means, events, and extremes) that affect an element of society or ecosystems. Depending on system tolerance, CIDs and their changes can be detrimental, beneficial, neutral, or a mixture of each across interacting system elements and regions.” We give background information on the IPCC Report process that led to the development of the 7 CID types (heat and cold, wet and dry, wind, snow and ice, coastal, open ocean, and other) and 33 distinct CID categories, each of which may be evaluated using a variety of CID indices. This inventory of CIDs was co-developed with WGII to provide a useful collaboration point between physical climate scientists and impacts/risk experts to assess the specific climatic phenomena driving sectoral responses and identify relevant CID indices within each sector. The CID Framework ensures that a comprehensive set of climatic conditions informs adaptation planning and risk management and may also help prioritize improvements in modeling sectoral dynamics that depend on climatic conditions. CIDs contribute to climate services by increasing coherence and neutrality when identifying and communicating relevant findings from physical climate research to risk assessment and planning activities.
AB - The climate science and applications communities need a broad and demand-driven concept to assess physical climate conditions that are relevant for impacts on human and natural systems. Here, we augment the description of the “climatic impact-driver” (CID) approach adopted in the Working Group I (WGI) contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report. CIDs are broadly defined as “physical climate system conditions (e.g., means, events, and extremes) that affect an element of society or ecosystems. Depending on system tolerance, CIDs and their changes can be detrimental, beneficial, neutral, or a mixture of each across interacting system elements and regions.” We give background information on the IPCC Report process that led to the development of the 7 CID types (heat and cold, wet and dry, wind, snow and ice, coastal, open ocean, and other) and 33 distinct CID categories, each of which may be evaluated using a variety of CID indices. This inventory of CIDs was co-developed with WGII to provide a useful collaboration point between physical climate scientists and impacts/risk experts to assess the specific climatic phenomena driving sectoral responses and identify relevant CID indices within each sector. The CID Framework ensures that a comprehensive set of climatic conditions informs adaptation planning and risk management and may also help prioritize improvements in modeling sectoral dynamics that depend on climatic conditions. CIDs contribute to climate services by increasing coherence and neutrality when identifying and communicating relevant findings from physical climate research to risk assessment and planning activities.
KW - climate hazards
KW - climate information
KW - climate projections
KW - climate risk
KW - climate services
KW - Climatic Impact-Driver (CID)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143224761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2022EF002803
DO - 10.1029/2022EF002803
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85143224761
VL - 10
JO - Earth's Future
JF - Earth's Future
SN - 2328-4277
IS - 11
M1 - e2022EF002803
ER -