The co-construction of entrepreneurial sensemaking: an empirical examination of socially situated cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurial cognitive development

Gabi Anja Kaffka

Abstract

This dissertation focuses on the topic of entrepreneurial cognitive development during business opportunity development. Business opportunity development takes place in a social context and is affected by the entrepreneur’s (inter)action with relevant stakeholders (Clarke & Cornelissen, 2011). Entrepreneurial researchers acknowledge the socially situated nature of entrepreneurial cognition (Mitchell et al., 2011). The research question central to this thesis is the following: How do socially situated cognitive mechanisms affect entrepreneurial cognitive development during business opportunity development? To answer this question, we undertook four empirical studies among entrepreneurs who participated in an institutional incubation/acceleration program. Theoretically, our findings contribute to conceptualizing the co-constructed nature of entrepreneurial sensemaking. In particular, the results of our research show language enables (meta-)cognitive development of entrepreneurs by means of socially situated cognitive mechanisms and demonstrate how entrepreneurs develop (meta-)cognitive skills through communicative interaction. Furthermore, this dissertation contributes methodically: By employing the diary method, we answer to Shepherd’s (2015) call for methodological experimentation and modernisation in scientific entrepreneurship research. On a practical level, entrepreneurs can leverage the insights from the empirical studies to reflect on and become (more) aware of being a particular ‘type’ of entrepreneur, particularly related to their previous entrepreneurial experience and the type of opportunity they are developing. Entrepreneurs can be more intentional about the set-up of a ‘community of inquiry’ (Shepherd & Patzelt, 2017) in which they can engage in thought exchange and leverage feedback from relevant stakeholders that help to shape the business opportunity. Students and academic researchers can benefit from our findings as well. The socially situated cognitive mechanisms can easily be integrated into experiential learning approaches which put emphasis on the development of soft skills, presentational skills and interpersonal communication, and which are considered important for higher education in general (Kolb & Kolb, 2005) and in entrepreneurial thinking in particular (Krueger, 2007). This dissertation also provides useful insights for the design of business incubation/acceleration programs.. For example, policy-makers can leverage the conceptualization of the process and outcomes of stakeholder interaction offered in the empirical studies in order to develop indicators for monitoring and evaluation of the efficient use of both coaching and panel interactions.
Original languageEnglish
Awarding Institution
  • University of Twente
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Groen, Arend J., Supervisor
  • Kraaijenbrink, J., Supervisor
Date of Award24 May 2017
Place of PublicationEnschede
Print ISBNs978-90-365-4320-0
DOIs
StatePublished - 24 May 2017

Fingerprint

Entrepreneurs
Interaction
Stakeholders
Cognitive development
Empirical study
Sensemaking
Social context
Experiential learning
Experimentation
Diary
Modernization
Coaching
Conceptualization
Co-construction
Interpersonal communication

Cite this

@misc{1b36475dcec64ade92adec444ba40b27,
title = "The co-construction of entrepreneurial sensemaking: an empirical examination of socially situated cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurial cognitive development",
abstract = "This dissertation focuses on the topic of entrepreneurial cognitive development during business opportunity development. Business opportunity development takes place in a social context and is affected by the entrepreneur’s (inter)action with relevant stakeholders (Clarke & Cornelissen, 2011). Entrepreneurial researchers acknowledge the socially situated nature of entrepreneurial cognition (Mitchell et al., 2011). The research question central to this thesis is the following: How do socially situated cognitive mechanisms affect entrepreneurial cognitive development during business opportunity development? To answer this question, we undertook four empirical studies among entrepreneurs who participated in an institutional incubation/acceleration program. Theoretically, our findings contribute to conceptualizing the co-constructed nature of entrepreneurial sensemaking. In particular, the results of our research show language enables (meta-)cognitive development of entrepreneurs by means of socially situated cognitive mechanisms and demonstrate how entrepreneurs develop (meta-)cognitive skills through communicative interaction. Furthermore, this dissertation contributes methodically: By employing the diary method, we answer to Shepherd’s (2015) call for methodological experimentation and modernisation in scientific entrepreneurship research. On a practical level, entrepreneurs can leverage the insights from the empirical studies to reflect on and become (more) aware of being a particular ‘type’ of entrepreneur, particularly related to their previous entrepreneurial experience and the type of opportunity they are developing. Entrepreneurs can be more intentional about the set-up of a ‘community of inquiry’ (Shepherd & Patzelt, 2017) in which they can engage in thought exchange and leverage feedback from relevant stakeholders that help to shape the business opportunity. Students and academic researchers can benefit from our findings as well. The socially situated cognitive mechanisms can easily be integrated into experiential learning approaches which put emphasis on the development of soft skills, presentational skills and interpersonal communication, and which are considered important for higher education in general (Kolb & Kolb, 2005) and in entrepreneurial thinking in particular (Krueger, 2007). This dissertation also provides useful insights for the design of business incubation/acceleration programs.. For example, policy-makers can leverage the conceptualization of the process and outcomes of stakeholder interaction offered in the empirical studies in order to develop indicators for monitoring and evaluation of the efficient use of both coaching and panel interactions.",
author = "Kaffka, {Gabi Anja}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
doi = "10.3990/1.9789036543200",
isbn = "978-90-365-4320-0",
school = "University of Twente",

}

The co-construction of entrepreneurial sensemaking : an empirical examination of socially situated cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurial cognitive development. / Kaffka, Gabi Anja.

Enschede, 2017. 297 p.

Research output: ScientificPhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT

TY - THES

T1 - The co-construction of entrepreneurial sensemaking

T2 - an empirical examination of socially situated cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurial cognitive development

AU - Kaffka,Gabi Anja

PY - 2017/5/24

Y1 - 2017/5/24

N2 - This dissertation focuses on the topic of entrepreneurial cognitive development during business opportunity development. Business opportunity development takes place in a social context and is affected by the entrepreneur’s (inter)action with relevant stakeholders (Clarke & Cornelissen, 2011). Entrepreneurial researchers acknowledge the socially situated nature of entrepreneurial cognition (Mitchell et al., 2011). The research question central to this thesis is the following: How do socially situated cognitive mechanisms affect entrepreneurial cognitive development during business opportunity development? To answer this question, we undertook four empirical studies among entrepreneurs who participated in an institutional incubation/acceleration program. Theoretically, our findings contribute to conceptualizing the co-constructed nature of entrepreneurial sensemaking. In particular, the results of our research show language enables (meta-)cognitive development of entrepreneurs by means of socially situated cognitive mechanisms and demonstrate how entrepreneurs develop (meta-)cognitive skills through communicative interaction. Furthermore, this dissertation contributes methodically: By employing the diary method, we answer to Shepherd’s (2015) call for methodological experimentation and modernisation in scientific entrepreneurship research. On a practical level, entrepreneurs can leverage the insights from the empirical studies to reflect on and become (more) aware of being a particular ‘type’ of entrepreneur, particularly related to their previous entrepreneurial experience and the type of opportunity they are developing. Entrepreneurs can be more intentional about the set-up of a ‘community of inquiry’ (Shepherd & Patzelt, 2017) in which they can engage in thought exchange and leverage feedback from relevant stakeholders that help to shape the business opportunity. Students and academic researchers can benefit from our findings as well. The socially situated cognitive mechanisms can easily be integrated into experiential learning approaches which put emphasis on the development of soft skills, presentational skills and interpersonal communication, and which are considered important for higher education in general (Kolb & Kolb, 2005) and in entrepreneurial thinking in particular (Krueger, 2007). This dissertation also provides useful insights for the design of business incubation/acceleration programs.. For example, policy-makers can leverage the conceptualization of the process and outcomes of stakeholder interaction offered in the empirical studies in order to develop indicators for monitoring and evaluation of the efficient use of both coaching and panel interactions.

AB - This dissertation focuses on the topic of entrepreneurial cognitive development during business opportunity development. Business opportunity development takes place in a social context and is affected by the entrepreneur’s (inter)action with relevant stakeholders (Clarke & Cornelissen, 2011). Entrepreneurial researchers acknowledge the socially situated nature of entrepreneurial cognition (Mitchell et al., 2011). The research question central to this thesis is the following: How do socially situated cognitive mechanisms affect entrepreneurial cognitive development during business opportunity development? To answer this question, we undertook four empirical studies among entrepreneurs who participated in an institutional incubation/acceleration program. Theoretically, our findings contribute to conceptualizing the co-constructed nature of entrepreneurial sensemaking. In particular, the results of our research show language enables (meta-)cognitive development of entrepreneurs by means of socially situated cognitive mechanisms and demonstrate how entrepreneurs develop (meta-)cognitive skills through communicative interaction. Furthermore, this dissertation contributes methodically: By employing the diary method, we answer to Shepherd’s (2015) call for methodological experimentation and modernisation in scientific entrepreneurship research. On a practical level, entrepreneurs can leverage the insights from the empirical studies to reflect on and become (more) aware of being a particular ‘type’ of entrepreneur, particularly related to their previous entrepreneurial experience and the type of opportunity they are developing. Entrepreneurs can be more intentional about the set-up of a ‘community of inquiry’ (Shepherd & Patzelt, 2017) in which they can engage in thought exchange and leverage feedback from relevant stakeholders that help to shape the business opportunity. Students and academic researchers can benefit from our findings as well. The socially situated cognitive mechanisms can easily be integrated into experiential learning approaches which put emphasis on the development of soft skills, presentational skills and interpersonal communication, and which are considered important for higher education in general (Kolb & Kolb, 2005) and in entrepreneurial thinking in particular (Krueger, 2007). This dissertation also provides useful insights for the design of business incubation/acceleration programs.. For example, policy-makers can leverage the conceptualization of the process and outcomes of stakeholder interaction offered in the empirical studies in order to develop indicators for monitoring and evaluation of the efficient use of both coaching and panel interactions.

U2 - 10.3990/1.9789036543200

DO - 10.3990/1.9789036543200

M3 - PhD Thesis - Research UT, graduation UT

SN - 978-90-365-4320-0

ER -