The continuing mismatch between IT governance maturity theory and practice: A new approach

Daniël Smits, Jos Van Hillegersberg

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

IT governance (ITG) has stayed a challenging matter for years. Research suggests the existence of a gap between theoretical frameworks and practice. Although current ITG research is largely focused on hard governance (structure, processes), soft governance (behavior, collaboration) is equally important and might be crucial to close the gap. The goal of this study is to determine if there remains a mismatch and test the usability of a new ITG maturity model. We conducted a systematic literature review to create an overview of available ITG maturity models, used one of these in ten case studies and evaluated its usability. The study shows five new models were introduced, and only one of the new ITG maturity models covers hard and soft ITG in detail. This model and corresponding instrument was used to test its usability in practice. The instrument was evaluated positively on usability; but feedback also revealed that the assessment questions needed improvements. We demonstrate that combining the instrument with structured interviews results in an enhanced and usable instrument to determine an organization's current level of hard and soft ITG. We conclude that this new instrument demonstrates a way to reduce the mismatch between ITG maturity theory and practice.

Fingerprint

Feedback

Keywords

  • "IT governance
  • Informal organization
  • IT governance maturity
  • Organizational culture."
  • Soft governance

Cite this

@article{9616798db307493aa4b2b465089729dc,
title = "The continuing mismatch between IT governance maturity theory and practice: A new approach",
abstract = "IT governance (ITG) has stayed a challenging matter for years. Research suggests the existence of a gap between theoretical frameworks and practice. Although current ITG research is largely focused on hard governance (structure, processes), soft governance (behavior, collaboration) is equally important and might be crucial to close the gap. The goal of this study is to determine if there remains a mismatch and test the usability of a new ITG maturity model. We conducted a systematic literature review to create an overview of available ITG maturity models, used one of these in ten case studies and evaluated its usability. The study shows five new models were introduced, and only one of the new ITG maturity models covers hard and soft ITG in detail. This model and corresponding instrument was used to test its usability in practice. The instrument was evaluated positively on usability; but feedback also revealed that the assessment questions needed improvements. We demonstrate that combining the instrument with structured interviews results in an enhanced and usable instrument to determine an organization's current level of hard and soft ITG. We conclude that this new instrument demonstrates a way to reduce the mismatch between ITG maturity theory and practice.",
keywords = "{"}IT governance, Informal organization, IT governance maturity, Organizational culture.{"}, Soft governance",
author = "Dani{\"e}l Smits and {Van Hillegersberg}, Jos",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.075",
language = "English",
volume = "138",
pages = "549--560",
journal = "Procedia computer science",
issn = "1877-0509",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

The continuing mismatch between IT governance maturity theory and practice : A new approach. / Smits, Daniël; Van Hillegersberg, Jos.

In: Procedia computer science, Vol. 138, 23.10.2018, p. 549-560.

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The continuing mismatch between IT governance maturity theory and practice

T2 - A new approach

AU - Smits, Daniël

AU - Van Hillegersberg, Jos

PY - 2018/10/23

Y1 - 2018/10/23

N2 - IT governance (ITG) has stayed a challenging matter for years. Research suggests the existence of a gap between theoretical frameworks and practice. Although current ITG research is largely focused on hard governance (structure, processes), soft governance (behavior, collaboration) is equally important and might be crucial to close the gap. The goal of this study is to determine if there remains a mismatch and test the usability of a new ITG maturity model. We conducted a systematic literature review to create an overview of available ITG maturity models, used one of these in ten case studies and evaluated its usability. The study shows five new models were introduced, and only one of the new ITG maturity models covers hard and soft ITG in detail. This model and corresponding instrument was used to test its usability in practice. The instrument was evaluated positively on usability; but feedback also revealed that the assessment questions needed improvements. We demonstrate that combining the instrument with structured interviews results in an enhanced and usable instrument to determine an organization's current level of hard and soft ITG. We conclude that this new instrument demonstrates a way to reduce the mismatch between ITG maturity theory and practice.

AB - IT governance (ITG) has stayed a challenging matter for years. Research suggests the existence of a gap between theoretical frameworks and practice. Although current ITG research is largely focused on hard governance (structure, processes), soft governance (behavior, collaboration) is equally important and might be crucial to close the gap. The goal of this study is to determine if there remains a mismatch and test the usability of a new ITG maturity model. We conducted a systematic literature review to create an overview of available ITG maturity models, used one of these in ten case studies and evaluated its usability. The study shows five new models were introduced, and only one of the new ITG maturity models covers hard and soft ITG in detail. This model and corresponding instrument was used to test its usability in practice. The instrument was evaluated positively on usability; but feedback also revealed that the assessment questions needed improvements. We demonstrate that combining the instrument with structured interviews results in an enhanced and usable instrument to determine an organization's current level of hard and soft ITG. We conclude that this new instrument demonstrates a way to reduce the mismatch between ITG maturity theory and practice.

KW - "IT governance

KW - Informal organization

KW - IT governance maturity

KW - Organizational culture."

KW - Soft governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061965229&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.075

DO - 10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.075

M3 - Conference article

VL - 138

SP - 549

EP - 560

JO - Procedia computer science

JF - Procedia computer science

SN - 1877-0509

ER -