TY - JOUR
T1 - The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology
T2 - A systematic review
AU - van Zyl, Llewellyn E.
AU - Gaffaney, Jaclyn
AU - van der Vaart, Leoni
AU - Dik, Bryan J.
AU - Donaldson, Stewart I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2023/2/23
Y1 - 2023/2/23
N2 - The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the current critiques and criticisms of positive psychology and to provide a consolidated view of the main challenges facing the third wave of research. The review identified 32 records that posed 117 unique criticisms and critiques of various areas of the discipline. These could be grouped into 21 categories through conventional content analysis, culminating in six overarching themes or ‘broad criticisms/critiques’. The findings suggested that positive psychology (a) lacked proper theorizing and conceptual thinking, (b) was problematic as far as measurement and methodologies were concerned, (c) was seen as a pseudoscience that lacked evidence and had poor replication, (d) lacked novelty and self-isolated itself from mainstream psychology, (e) was a decontextualized neoliberalist ideology that caused harm, and (f) was a capitalistic venture. We briefly reflect on the findings and highlight the opportunities these criticisms and critiques present.
AB - The purpose of this systematic literature review was to explore the current critiques and criticisms of positive psychology and to provide a consolidated view of the main challenges facing the third wave of research. The review identified 32 records that posed 117 unique criticisms and critiques of various areas of the discipline. These could be grouped into 21 categories through conventional content analysis, culminating in six overarching themes or ‘broad criticisms/critiques’. The findings suggested that positive psychology (a) lacked proper theorizing and conceptual thinking, (b) was problematic as far as measurement and methodologies were concerned, (c) was seen as a pseudoscience that lacked evidence and had poor replication, (d) lacked novelty and self-isolated itself from mainstream psychology, (e) was a decontextualized neoliberalist ideology that caused harm, and (f) was a capitalistic venture. We briefly reflect on the findings and highlight the opportunities these criticisms and critiques present.
KW - UT-Hybrid-D
KW - Criticisms of positive psychology
KW - critiques
KW - opportunities
KW - positive psychology
KW - Third Wave Positive Psychology
KW - challenges
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148617518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/17439760.2023.2178956
DO - 10.1080/17439760.2023.2178956
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85148617518
SN - 1743-9760
JO - Journal of Positive Psychology
JF - Journal of Positive Psychology
ER -