TY - JOUR
T1 - The development of governance innovations for the sustainable provision of forest ecosystem services in Europe
T2 - A comparative analysis of four pilot innovation processes
AU - Loft, Lasse
AU - Schleyer, Christian
AU - Klingler, Michael
AU - Kister, Jutta
AU - Zoll, Felix
AU - Stegmaier, Peter
AU - Aukes, Ewert J.
AU - Sorge, Stefan
AU - Mann, Carsten
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the Innovation Region Teams for their cooperation and Manuel Asbach for his support in data analysis. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 under Grant Agreement number 763899, InnoForESt project, within the Innovation Action.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - In the past decades, novel governance and management approaches that support the provision of nonmarketable Forest Ecosystem Services (FES) have emerged throughout Europe. However, it remains unclear under which circumstances such modes of FES governance develop and which sets of socialecological parameters, management formats, and interests enable or constrain these processes. In thispaper, we aim to shed light on the development processes of such governance innovations. We combine approaches from natural resource governance with insights from innovation studies to identify the close interrelations between designing governance approaches and the inherent innovation dynamics in theirdevelopment. Empirically, we apply an adapted innovation journey approach to reconstruct the development history of four governance innovations in Europe. We analyse key turning points and crucial influencing factors of the innovation processes, focussing on interests, resources, and values of actors, biophysical and technical conditions of the forest resource systems, institutions and governance arrangements, and features of the innovation management. Our findings show that often individual actors became mainstays of the innovation developments, whereas governmental organisations took up an important role in managing the innovation development process, without being the main changeagents. Further, in cases with a reliable legal environment and existing funding schemes innovation development was fostered effectively. While various natural disturbances negatively impacted upon innovation development, most crisis-related interruptions provided an opportunity for radically changing pathways. We conclude that to cope with these uncertain development dynamics, conditionsfor innovation development need to be created that allow for continuous monitoring and adaptation of innovation processes along their development. For future governance innovation development processes, this calls for the setup of protected spaces that allow for stakeholder participation and open deliberation of interests and expectations regarding FES provisioning as preconditions for governance co-design work based on mutual learning and reflection.
AB - In the past decades, novel governance and management approaches that support the provision of nonmarketable Forest Ecosystem Services (FES) have emerged throughout Europe. However, it remains unclear under which circumstances such modes of FES governance develop and which sets of socialecological parameters, management formats, and interests enable or constrain these processes. In thispaper, we aim to shed light on the development processes of such governance innovations. We combine approaches from natural resource governance with insights from innovation studies to identify the close interrelations between designing governance approaches and the inherent innovation dynamics in theirdevelopment. Empirically, we apply an adapted innovation journey approach to reconstruct the development history of four governance innovations in Europe. We analyse key turning points and crucial influencing factors of the innovation processes, focussing on interests, resources, and values of actors, biophysical and technical conditions of the forest resource systems, institutions and governance arrangements, and features of the innovation management. Our findings show that often individual actors became mainstays of the innovation developments, whereas governmental organisations took up an important role in managing the innovation development process, without being the main changeagents. Further, in cases with a reliable legal environment and existing funding schemes innovation development was fostered effectively. While various natural disturbances negatively impacted upon innovation development, most crisis-related interruptions provided an opportunity for radically changing pathways. We conclude that to cope with these uncertain development dynamics, conditionsfor innovation development need to be created that allow for continuous monitoring and adaptation of innovation processes along their development. For future governance innovation development processes, this calls for the setup of protected spaces that allow for stakeholder participation and open deliberation of interests and expectations regarding FES provisioning as preconditions for governance co-design work based on mutual learning and reflection.
KW - Forest policy
KW - Forest management
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Governance
KW - Constructive Innovation Assessment (CINA)
KW - Innovation journey
KW - EU
KW - 22/4 OA procedure
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101481
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101481
M3 - Article
SN - 2212-0416
VL - 58
JO - Ecosystem services
JF - Ecosystem services
M1 - 101481
ER -