The ecological social contract

Jos de Beus

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

The natural environment of human beings often connotes publicness. Ecologists argue that an elimination of the current ecological catastrophe is a public good at local, regional, fluvial, continental or global levels; consider for instance, the dumping of poisonous waste, eutrophication, deforestation, acidification or ozone layer depletion. At all these levels the common interests of large numbers of human beings are at stake, including the interests of other sentients derived from these interests.’ Economists stress that the solution of urgent environmental problems will buttress public opulence, Paretian efficiency or social welfare in the long run. And political scientists state that the green movement differs from old social movements, since the old “us against them” perspective is replaced by an “all of us” perspective (Offe, 1990p. 234). Many of these scientists argue that the contemporary ecological crisis has been brought about by a lack of coordination and a conflict about the distribution of the costs of coordination between persons and corporate actors: the ecosystem has attained a state of anarchy. That may very well be the moment for salvation of the Hobbesian Leviathan, the opposite of theZeitgeist of libertarianism, regional politics, and global capitalism (Siebert, 1990p. 18).
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEnvironmental protection
Subtitle of host publicationpublic or private choice
EditorsR.J. in 't Veld, D.J. Kraan
Place of PublicationDordrecht
PublisherKluwer
Pages181-205
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)978-94-011-3560-3
ISBN (Print)978-94-010-5577-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1991

Publication series

NameEconomy & environment
PublisherKluwer Academic Publishers
Number4
ISSN (Print)0924-1019

Fingerprint

regional politics
social movement
capitalism
deforestation
acidification
eutrophication
ecosystem
cost
co-ordination
contract
natural environment
distribution
conflict
catastrophe
public
dumping
social welfare
ozone layer depletion

Keywords

  • Public choice
  • Environmental policy
  • Social contract
  • Social contract theory
  • Ozone layer depletion

Cite this

de Beus, J. (1991). The ecological social contract. In R. J. in 't Veld, & D. J. Kraan (Eds.), Environmental protection: public or private choice (pp. 181-205). (Economy & environment; No. 4). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3560-3_11
de Beus, Jos. / The ecological social contract. Environmental protection: public or private choice. editor / R.J. in 't Veld ; D.J. Kraan. Dordrecht : Kluwer, 1991. pp. 181-205 (Economy & environment; 4).
@inbook{46214961fca84d7b932c0c00b20be2a2,
title = "The ecological social contract",
abstract = "The natural environment of human beings often connotes publicness. Ecologists argue that an elimination of the current ecological catastrophe is a public good at local, regional, fluvial, continental or global levels; consider for instance, the dumping of poisonous waste, eutrophication, deforestation, acidification or ozone layer depletion. At all these levels the common interests of large numbers of human beings are at stake, including the interests of other sentients derived from these interests.’ Economists stress that the solution of urgent environmental problems will buttress public opulence, Paretian efficiency or social welfare in the long run. And political scientists state that the green movement differs from old social movements, since the old “us against them” perspective is replaced by an “all of us” perspective (Offe, 1990p. 234). Many of these scientists argue that the contemporary ecological crisis has been brought about by a lack of coordination and a conflict about the distribution of the costs of coordination between persons and corporate actors: the ecosystem has attained a state of anarchy. That may very well be the moment for salvation of the Hobbesian Leviathan, the opposite of theZeitgeist of libertarianism, regional politics, and global capitalism (Siebert, 1990p. 18).",
keywords = "Public choice, Environmental policy, Social contract, Social contract theory, Ozone layer depletion",
author = "{de Beus}, Jos",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-011-3560-3_11",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-94-010-5577-2",
series = "Economy & environment",
publisher = "Kluwer",
number = "4",
pages = "181--205",
editor = "{in 't Veld}, R.J. and D.J. Kraan",
booktitle = "Environmental protection",
address = "Netherlands",

}

de Beus, J 1991, The ecological social contract. in RJ in 't Veld & DJ Kraan (eds), Environmental protection: public or private choice. Economy & environment, no. 4, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 181-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3560-3_11

The ecological social contract. / de Beus, Jos.

Environmental protection: public or private choice. ed. / R.J. in 't Veld; D.J. Kraan. Dordrecht : Kluwer, 1991. p. 181-205 (Economy & environment; No. 4).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

TY - CHAP

T1 - The ecological social contract

AU - de Beus, Jos

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - The natural environment of human beings often connotes publicness. Ecologists argue that an elimination of the current ecological catastrophe is a public good at local, regional, fluvial, continental or global levels; consider for instance, the dumping of poisonous waste, eutrophication, deforestation, acidification or ozone layer depletion. At all these levels the common interests of large numbers of human beings are at stake, including the interests of other sentients derived from these interests.’ Economists stress that the solution of urgent environmental problems will buttress public opulence, Paretian efficiency or social welfare in the long run. And political scientists state that the green movement differs from old social movements, since the old “us against them” perspective is replaced by an “all of us” perspective (Offe, 1990p. 234). Many of these scientists argue that the contemporary ecological crisis has been brought about by a lack of coordination and a conflict about the distribution of the costs of coordination between persons and corporate actors: the ecosystem has attained a state of anarchy. That may very well be the moment for salvation of the Hobbesian Leviathan, the opposite of theZeitgeist of libertarianism, regional politics, and global capitalism (Siebert, 1990p. 18).

AB - The natural environment of human beings often connotes publicness. Ecologists argue that an elimination of the current ecological catastrophe is a public good at local, regional, fluvial, continental or global levels; consider for instance, the dumping of poisonous waste, eutrophication, deforestation, acidification or ozone layer depletion. At all these levels the common interests of large numbers of human beings are at stake, including the interests of other sentients derived from these interests.’ Economists stress that the solution of urgent environmental problems will buttress public opulence, Paretian efficiency or social welfare in the long run. And political scientists state that the green movement differs from old social movements, since the old “us against them” perspective is replaced by an “all of us” perspective (Offe, 1990p. 234). Many of these scientists argue that the contemporary ecological crisis has been brought about by a lack of coordination and a conflict about the distribution of the costs of coordination between persons and corporate actors: the ecosystem has attained a state of anarchy. That may very well be the moment for salvation of the Hobbesian Leviathan, the opposite of theZeitgeist of libertarianism, regional politics, and global capitalism (Siebert, 1990p. 18).

KW - Public choice

KW - Environmental policy

KW - Social contract

KW - Social contract theory

KW - Ozone layer depletion

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-011-3560-3_11

DO - 10.1007/978-94-011-3560-3_11

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-94-010-5577-2

T3 - Economy & environment

SP - 181

EP - 205

BT - Environmental protection

A2 - in 't Veld, R.J.

A2 - Kraan, D.J.

PB - Kluwer

CY - Dordrecht

ER -

de Beus J. The ecological social contract. In in 't Veld RJ, Kraan DJ, editors, Environmental protection: public or private choice. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1991. p. 181-205. (Economy & environment; 4). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3560-3_11