The effects of balanced and asymmetric dependence on supplier satisfaction: Identifying positive effects of dependency

Marjolein C.J. Caniëls (Corresponding Author), Frederik G.S. Vos, Holger Schiele, Niels J. Pulles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Studies argue that balance in dependence is critical to supplier satisfaction in buyer-supplier relationships. We examine whether asymmetric relationships can also lead to supplier satisfaction, arguing that traditional analysis methods are unsuitable for thoroughly analyzing this issue. With polynomial regression and response surface analysis combined with dyadic data, we test the relationship between (1) balanced dependence (i.e., the buyer and supplier are equally dependent on each other) and supplier satisfaction and (2) asymmetric dependence (i.e., either the supplier or buyer is the dominant party) on supplier satisfaction. The results indicate that mutual dependence is positively related to supplier satisfaction, but surprisingly, asymmetric dependence can be related to higher levels of supplier satisfaction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)343-351
JournalJournal of purchasing and supply management
Volume24
Issue number4
Early online date23 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Surface analysis
Polynomials
Asymmetric dependence
Suppliers

Keywords

  • Buyer-supplier dependence
  • Polynomial regression
  • Supplier satisfaction

Cite this

@article{4cfe4163138e46848c9bb24d851e7e8f,
title = "The effects of balanced and asymmetric dependence on supplier satisfaction: Identifying positive effects of dependency",
abstract = "Studies argue that balance in dependence is critical to supplier satisfaction in buyer-supplier relationships. We examine whether asymmetric relationships can also lead to supplier satisfaction, arguing that traditional analysis methods are unsuitable for thoroughly analyzing this issue. With polynomial regression and response surface analysis combined with dyadic data, we test the relationship between (1) balanced dependence (i.e., the buyer and supplier are equally dependent on each other) and supplier satisfaction and (2) asymmetric dependence (i.e., either the supplier or buyer is the dominant party) on supplier satisfaction. The results indicate that mutual dependence is positively related to supplier satisfaction, but surprisingly, asymmetric dependence can be related to higher levels of supplier satisfaction.",
keywords = "Buyer-supplier dependence, Polynomial regression, Supplier satisfaction",
author = "Cani{\"e}ls, {Marjolein C.J.} and Vos, {Frederik G.S.} and Holger Schiele and Pulles, {Niels J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.pursup.2017.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "343--351",
journal = "Journal of purchasing and supply management",
issn = "1478-4092",
publisher = "Butterworth Scientific Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

The effects of balanced and asymmetric dependence on supplier satisfaction : Identifying positive effects of dependency. / Caniëls, Marjolein C.J. (Corresponding Author); Vos, Frederik G.S.; Schiele, Holger; Pulles, Niels J.

In: Journal of purchasing and supply management, Vol. 24, No. 4, 10.2018, p. 343-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of balanced and asymmetric dependence on supplier satisfaction

T2 - Identifying positive effects of dependency

AU - Caniëls, Marjolein C.J.

AU - Vos, Frederik G.S.

AU - Schiele, Holger

AU - Pulles, Niels J.

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - Studies argue that balance in dependence is critical to supplier satisfaction in buyer-supplier relationships. We examine whether asymmetric relationships can also lead to supplier satisfaction, arguing that traditional analysis methods are unsuitable for thoroughly analyzing this issue. With polynomial regression and response surface analysis combined with dyadic data, we test the relationship between (1) balanced dependence (i.e., the buyer and supplier are equally dependent on each other) and supplier satisfaction and (2) asymmetric dependence (i.e., either the supplier or buyer is the dominant party) on supplier satisfaction. The results indicate that mutual dependence is positively related to supplier satisfaction, but surprisingly, asymmetric dependence can be related to higher levels of supplier satisfaction.

AB - Studies argue that balance in dependence is critical to supplier satisfaction in buyer-supplier relationships. We examine whether asymmetric relationships can also lead to supplier satisfaction, arguing that traditional analysis methods are unsuitable for thoroughly analyzing this issue. With polynomial regression and response surface analysis combined with dyadic data, we test the relationship between (1) balanced dependence (i.e., the buyer and supplier are equally dependent on each other) and supplier satisfaction and (2) asymmetric dependence (i.e., either the supplier or buyer is the dominant party) on supplier satisfaction. The results indicate that mutual dependence is positively related to supplier satisfaction, but surprisingly, asymmetric dependence can be related to higher levels of supplier satisfaction.

KW - Buyer-supplier dependence

KW - Polynomial regression

KW - Supplier satisfaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034850304&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pursup.2017.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.pursup.2017.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 343

EP - 351

JO - Journal of purchasing and supply management

JF - Journal of purchasing and supply management

SN - 1478-4092

IS - 4

ER -