Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The efficacy of Life Review Therapy combined with Memory Specificity Training (LRT-MST) targeting cancer patients in palliative care: A randomized controlled trial

  • Gitta Kleijn
  • , Birgit I. Lissenberg-Witte
  • , Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
  • , Bas Steunenberg
  • , Kitty Knipscheer-Kuijpers
  • , Vincent Willemsen
  • , Annemarie Becker
  • , Egbert F. Smit
  • , Corien M. Eeltink
  • , Anna M.E. Bruynzeel
  • , Maurice van der Vorst
  • , Remco de Bree
  • , C. René Leemans
  • , Michiel W.M. van den Brekel
  • , Pim Cuijpers
  • , Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw* (Corresponding Author)
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

    152 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention combining Life Review Therapy (LRT) and Memory Specificity Training (MST) (LRT-MST) to improve ego-integrity and despair among cancer patients in palliative care. Methods In this multicentre randomized controlled trial, cancer patients in palliative care were randomized to the intervention group (LRT-MST; n = 55) or waiting-list control group (n = 52). LRT-MST is a 4-session home-based psychological intervention that aims to retrieve specific positive memories, to re-evaluate life events and to reconstruct the story of a patient’s life, including the diagnosis of incurable cancer. Outcome measures were ego-integrity and despair (NEIS), psychological distress, anxiety and depression (HADS), quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), and specificity of the autobiographical memory (AMT). NEIS, HADS and EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL were assessed at baseline (T0), 1 month later (post-treatment; T1), and at 1 month follow-up (T2). AMT was assessed at T0 and T1. Linear mixed models (intention to treat) were used to assess group differences in changes over time. Independent samples t-tests were used to assess group differences at T0, T1, and T2, and effect sizes (ES) were calculated at T1 and T2. Results The course of ego-integrity (not despair) improved significantly over time (p = .007) in the intervention group compared to the waiting-list control group, with moderate, but insignificant, effect sizes at T1 (ES = .42) and T2 (ES = .48). Compliance rate was 69% and total dropout rate was 28%, both primarily related to disease progression and death. Conclusions LRT-MST seems effective among cancer patients in palliative care to improve the course of ego-integrity.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere0197277
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Volume13
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2018

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The efficacy of Life Review Therapy combined with Memory Specificity Training (LRT-MST) targeting cancer patients in palliative care: A randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this