The Grid, Classification of eHealth Applications Towards a Better (re)Design and Evaluation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

eHealth holds a diverse range of successful and unsuccessful applications. It is often unclear why this difference in success appears because eHealth is usually approached as a black box. Additionally, we tend to evaluate non-treatment-like and treatment-like applications the same way. Both approaches focus on searching for effects and outcomes. This results in applications that are wrongfully put away. Placing an application on the continuous dimensions of use-structure and caregiver involvement on the grid presented in this paper helps to make conscious and better decisions when (re)designing and evaluating eHealth applications. Positioning on the grid influences the terms ’user’ and ’usage’ but also has implications for the way we can evaluate and (re)design eHealth applications. The grid is a tool to gain insight, facilitate thought processes, and start discussions, and is not meant to be a formal and rigid model. This tool helps making conscious choices in (re)design and evaluation of applications.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationeTELEMED 2016: The Eighth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine
Editorsmarike Hettinga
PublisherIARIA
Pages98-103
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)978-1-61208-470-1
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event8th International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, eTELEMED 2016 - Venice, Italy
Duration: 24 Apr 201628 Apr 2016
Conference number: 8
https://www.iaria.org/conferences2016/eTELEMED16.html

Publication series

Name
PublisherIARIA

Conference

Conference8th International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, eTELEMED 2016
Abbreviated titleeTELEMED
CountryItaly
CityVenice
Period24/04/1628/04/16
Internet address

Keywords

  • METIS-319898
  • IR-102708

Cite this

Akkersdijk, S. M., Kelders, S. M., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C. (2016). The Grid, Classification of eHealth Applications Towards a Better (re)Design and Evaluation. In M. Hettinga (Ed.), eTELEMED 2016: The Eighth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine (pp. 98-103). IARIA.
Akkersdijk, Saskia Marjan ; Kelders, Saskia Marion ; van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E.W.C. / The Grid, Classification of eHealth Applications Towards a Better (re)Design and Evaluation. eTELEMED 2016: The Eighth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine. editor / marike Hettinga. IARIA, 2016. pp. 98-103
@inproceedings{23cdcb8abcce4e20a8c08ff7485a1ba4,
title = "The Grid, Classification of eHealth Applications Towards a Better (re)Design and Evaluation",
abstract = "eHealth holds a diverse range of successful and unsuccessful applications. It is often unclear why this difference in success appears because eHealth is usually approached as a black box. Additionally, we tend to evaluate non-treatment-like and treatment-like applications the same way. Both approaches focus on searching for effects and outcomes. This results in applications that are wrongfully put away. Placing an application on the continuous dimensions of use-structure and caregiver involvement on the grid presented in this paper helps to make conscious and better decisions when (re)designing and evaluating eHealth applications. Positioning on the grid influences the terms ’user’ and ’usage’ but also has implications for the way we can evaluate and (re)design eHealth applications. The grid is a tool to gain insight, facilitate thought processes, and start discussions, and is not meant to be a formal and rigid model. This tool helps making conscious choices in (re)design and evaluation of applications.",
keywords = "METIS-319898, IR-102708",
author = "Akkersdijk, {Saskia Marjan} and Kelders, {Saskia Marion} and {van Gemert-Pijnen}, {Julia E.W.C.}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-61208-470-1",
publisher = "IARIA",
pages = "98--103",
editor = "marike Hettinga",
booktitle = "eTELEMED 2016: The Eighth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine",

}

Akkersdijk, SM, Kelders, SM & van Gemert-Pijnen, JEWC 2016, The Grid, Classification of eHealth Applications Towards a Better (re)Design and Evaluation. in M Hettinga (ed.), eTELEMED 2016: The Eighth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine. IARIA, pp. 98-103, 8th International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, eTELEMED 2016, Venice, Italy, 24/04/16.

The Grid, Classification of eHealth Applications Towards a Better (re)Design and Evaluation. / Akkersdijk, Saskia Marjan; Kelders, Saskia Marion; van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E.W.C.

eTELEMED 2016: The Eighth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine. ed. / marike Hettinga. IARIA, 2016. p. 98-103.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - The Grid, Classification of eHealth Applications Towards a Better (re)Design and Evaluation

AU - Akkersdijk, Saskia Marjan

AU - Kelders, Saskia Marion

AU - van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E.W.C.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - eHealth holds a diverse range of successful and unsuccessful applications. It is often unclear why this difference in success appears because eHealth is usually approached as a black box. Additionally, we tend to evaluate non-treatment-like and treatment-like applications the same way. Both approaches focus on searching for effects and outcomes. This results in applications that are wrongfully put away. Placing an application on the continuous dimensions of use-structure and caregiver involvement on the grid presented in this paper helps to make conscious and better decisions when (re)designing and evaluating eHealth applications. Positioning on the grid influences the terms ’user’ and ’usage’ but also has implications for the way we can evaluate and (re)design eHealth applications. The grid is a tool to gain insight, facilitate thought processes, and start discussions, and is not meant to be a formal and rigid model. This tool helps making conscious choices in (re)design and evaluation of applications.

AB - eHealth holds a diverse range of successful and unsuccessful applications. It is often unclear why this difference in success appears because eHealth is usually approached as a black box. Additionally, we tend to evaluate non-treatment-like and treatment-like applications the same way. Both approaches focus on searching for effects and outcomes. This results in applications that are wrongfully put away. Placing an application on the continuous dimensions of use-structure and caregiver involvement on the grid presented in this paper helps to make conscious and better decisions when (re)designing and evaluating eHealth applications. Positioning on the grid influences the terms ’user’ and ’usage’ but also has implications for the way we can evaluate and (re)design eHealth applications. The grid is a tool to gain insight, facilitate thought processes, and start discussions, and is not meant to be a formal and rigid model. This tool helps making conscious choices in (re)design and evaluation of applications.

KW - METIS-319898

KW - IR-102708

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-1-61208-470-1

SP - 98

EP - 103

BT - eTELEMED 2016: The Eighth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine

A2 - Hettinga, marike

PB - IARIA

ER -

Akkersdijk SM, Kelders SM, van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC. The Grid, Classification of eHealth Applications Towards a Better (re)Design and Evaluation. In Hettinga M, editor, eTELEMED 2016: The Eighth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine. IARIA. 2016. p. 98-103