Abstract
eHealth holds a diverse range of successful and unsuccessful applications. It is often unclear why this difference in success appears because eHealth is usually approached as a black box. Additionally, we tend to evaluate non-treatment-like and treatment-like applications the same way. Both approaches focus on searching for effects and outcomes. This results in applications that are wrongfully put away. Placing an application on the continuous dimensions of use-structure and caregiver involvement on the grid presented in this paper helps to make conscious and better decisions when (re)designing and evaluating eHealth applications. Positioning on the grid influences the terms ’user’ and ’usage’ but also has implications for the way we can evaluate and (re)design eHealth applications. The grid is a tool to gain insight, facilitate thought processes, and start discussions, and is not meant to be a formal and rigid model. This tool helps making conscious choices in (re)design and evaluation of applications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | eTELEMED 2016: The Eighth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine |
Editors | marike Hettinga |
Publisher | International Academy, Research, and Industry Association (IARIA) |
Pages | 98-103 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-61208-470-1 |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Event | 8th International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, eTELEMED 2016 - Venice, Italy Duration: 24 Apr 2016 → 28 Apr 2016 Conference number: 8 https://www.iaria.org/conferences2016/eTELEMED16.html |
Publication series
Name | |
---|---|
Publisher | IARIA |
Conference
Conference | 8th International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, eTELEMED 2016 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | eTELEMED |
Country/Territory | Italy |
City | Venice |
Period | 24/04/16 → 28/04/16 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- METIS-319898
- IR-102708