Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The impact of a mainstream genetic testing pathway and socioeconomic factors on the uptake of germline genetic testing in breast cancer patients: results of the nationwide GENE-SMART study

  • Chiem Leonardo de Jong
  • , Sabine Siesling
  • , Ghita Carola Wilhelmina Maria Puts
  • , Agnes Jager
  • , Margreet Geertruda Elia Maria Ausems*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Genetic testing in breast cancer patients is important for the patient’s local and systemic treatment choices and follow-up, as well as for their family members. Not all eligible patients currently undergo genetic testing and disparities persist in genetic testing uptake. It is unknown on the large scale whether pre-test counselling by non-genetic healthcare professionals (HCPs)–mainstream genetic testing (MGT) – improves overall genetic testing uptake and reduces disparities. We examined the impact of MGT on germline genetic testing uptake in general and in subgroups of socioeconomic status (SES) in particular. Methods: In this retrospective nationwide cohort study, we selected all breast cancer patients from the Netherlands Cancer Registry who were eligible for genetic testing according to patient and tumour characteristics under the Dutch guidelines and who were diagnosed between 1-Jan-2017 and 31-Dec-2022. The primary outcome was genetic testing uptake. The influence of MGT and SES on overall uptake and uptake across different SES levels was evaluated using chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 12,071 breast cancer patients were included. Overall genetic testing uptake was 67%: 78% for MGT versus 63% in referral to a genetics department (RGD) (p < 0.001) with significantly higher odds of receiving genetic testing for MGT versus RGD (OR 2.48, 95% CI 2.14–2.87). Patients with low SES showed significantly lower odds of receiving genetic testing compared to those with a high SES (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61–0.83). In MGT, no significant difference was found between low and high SES in the likelihood of receiving genetic testing (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.50–1.13). Conclusions: MGT significantly increases genetic testing uptake among all eligible patients and across all SES subgroups, strongly encouraging further implementation of MGT. Educating HCPs about current disparities in genetic testing is essential to improve health equity in breast cancer care.

Original languageEnglish
Article number129
JournalBreast cancer research
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
    SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Disparities
  • Genetic testing
  • Mainstream genetic testing
  • Socioeconomic status

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of a mainstream genetic testing pathway and socioeconomic factors on the uptake of germline genetic testing in breast cancer patients: results of the nationwide GENE-SMART study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this