The importance of harmonising diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief

Lonneke I.M. Lenferink; Paul A. Boelen; Geert E. Smid; Muirne C.S. Paap

doi:10.1192/bjp.2019.240

The importance of harmonising diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief

Lonneke I.M. Lenferink^*, Paul A. Boelen, Geert E. Smid, Muirne C.S. Paap

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

56 Citations (Scopus)

24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Five diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief are currently used in research. Studies evaluating their performance indicate that it is not justified to generalise findings regarding prevalence rates and predictive validity across studies using different diagnostic criteria of pathological grief. We provide recommendations to move the bereavement field forward.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	473-476
Number of pages	4
Journal	British journal of psychiatry
Volume	219
Issue number	3
Early online date	13 Nov 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.240
Publication status	Published - Sept 2021
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

complicated grief
DSM-5
ICD-11
Persistent complex bereavement disorder
prolonged grief disorder

Access to Document

10.1192/bjp.2019.240Licence: CC BY

the-importance-of-harmonising-diagnostic-criteria-sets-for-pathological-griefFinal published version, 346 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{e341d379dd6941cca43039de2eb05eb0,

title = "The importance of harmonising diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief",

abstract = "Five diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief are currently used in research. Studies evaluating their performance indicate that it is not justified to generalise findings regarding prevalence rates and predictive validity across studies using different diagnostic criteria of pathological grief. We provide recommendations to move the bereavement field forward. ",

keywords = "complicated grief, DSM-5, ICD-11, Persistent complex bereavement disorder, prolonged grief disorder",

author = "Lenferink, {Lonneke I.M.} and Boelen, {Paul A.} and Smid, {Geert E.} and Paap, {Muirne C.S.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2019.",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1192/bjp.2019.240",

language = "English",

volume = "219",

pages = "473--476",

journal = "British journal of psychiatry",

issn = "0007-1250",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The importance of harmonising diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief

AU - Lenferink, Lonneke I.M.

AU - Boelen, Paul A.

AU - Smid, Geert E.

AU - Paap, Muirne C.S.

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - Five diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief are currently used in research. Studies evaluating their performance indicate that it is not justified to generalise findings regarding prevalence rates and predictive validity across studies using different diagnostic criteria of pathological grief. We provide recommendations to move the bereavement field forward.

AB - Five diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief are currently used in research. Studies evaluating their performance indicate that it is not justified to generalise findings regarding prevalence rates and predictive validity across studies using different diagnostic criteria of pathological grief. We provide recommendations to move the bereavement field forward.

KW - complicated grief

KW - DSM-5

KW - ICD-11

KW - Persistent complex bereavement disorder

KW - prolonged grief disorder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113830828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1192/bjp.2019.240

DO - 10.1192/bjp.2019.240

M3 - Article

C2 - 31718725

AN - SCOPUS:85113830828

SN - 0007-1250

VL - 219

SP - 473

EP - 476

JO - British journal of psychiatry

JF - British journal of psychiatry

IS - 3

ER -

The importance of harmonising diagnostic criteria sets for pathological grief

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this