The Influence of External Information on Collective Bargaining: Survey Evidence of Union and Firm Negotiators in the Netherlands

Alex Lehr, Agnes Akkerman, René Torenvlied

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper seeks to answer two questions: 1- To what extent are negotiators in collective bargaining influenced by different types of external information? 2- How can differences in the influence of external information between negotiators be explained by the characteristics of the negotiators and bargaining units? A standardized questionnaire measuring self-reported influences of different types of external information was developed and administered to a representative sample of union and firm negotiators in the Netherlands. In total, 123 negotiators participated in the survey. Four types of external information were investigated: 1- economic information; 2- information on organizational power; 3- institutional information; and 4- information spillovers. Descriptive analyses show that economic information, particularly when referring to the sector level, was very influential, as was institutional information on national and sectoral collective agreement developments. Information reflecting organizational power, e.g. militancy, carried less weight, while information on other bargaining events, i.e. spillover, was also very important. From extant theory, empirical findings and common assumptions in labour relations literature, the paper developed and tested a number of hypotheses concerning the influence of external information. It was found that the influence of spillovers increased with the proximity of their source. Union negotiators were generally more influenced by external information than firm negotiators. There was some evidence that influence increased with experience, but this effect was rather modest. Evidence that negotiators in sector bargaining were less affected by the economic environment than negotiators in company bargaining was weak, but they were found to be less influenced by spillovers and international collective agreement developments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)327-352
JournalRelations industrielles = Industrial relations
Volume70
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Economics
International cooperation
Personnel
The Netherlands
Collective bargaining
Industry
Spillover

Keywords

  • METIS-315846
  • IR-99430

Cite this

@article{b71951fe2aa84d46838e098ef66e1b26,
title = "The Influence of External Information on Collective Bargaining: Survey Evidence of Union and Firm Negotiators in the Netherlands",
abstract = "This paper seeks to answer two questions: 1- To what extent are negotiators in collective bargaining influenced by different types of external information? 2- How can differences in the influence of external information between negotiators be explained by the characteristics of the negotiators and bargaining units? A standardized questionnaire measuring self-reported influences of different types of external information was developed and administered to a representative sample of union and firm negotiators in the Netherlands. In total, 123 negotiators participated in the survey. Four types of external information were investigated: 1- economic information; 2- information on organizational power; 3- institutional information; and 4- information spillovers. Descriptive analyses show that economic information, particularly when referring to the sector level, was very influential, as was institutional information on national and sectoral collective agreement developments. Information reflecting organizational power, e.g. militancy, carried less weight, while information on other bargaining events, i.e. spillover, was also very important. From extant theory, empirical findings and common assumptions in labour relations literature, the paper developed and tested a number of hypotheses concerning the influence of external information. It was found that the influence of spillovers increased with the proximity of their source. Union negotiators were generally more influenced by external information than firm negotiators. There was some evidence that influence increased with experience, but this effect was rather modest. Evidence that negotiators in sector bargaining were less affected by the economic environment than negotiators in company bargaining was weak, but they were found to be less influenced by spillovers and international collective agreement developments.",
keywords = "METIS-315846, IR-99430",
author = "Alex Lehr and Agnes Akkerman and Ren{\'e} Torenvlied",
note = "Special issue: Le syndicalisme en qu{\^e}te d’autonomie et de renouvellement en Europe : {\'E}tudes de cas : Gr{\`e}ce, Espagne, Portugal et France / Unionism in Search of Autonomy and Renewal in Europe : Case Studies: Greece, Spain, Portugal and France",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.7202/1031488ar",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "327--352",
journal = "Relations industrielles = Industrial relations",
issn = "0034-379X",
publisher = "Laval University, Department of Industrial Relations",
number = "2",

}

The Influence of External Information on Collective Bargaining: Survey Evidence of Union and Firm Negotiators in the Netherlands. / Lehr, Alex; Akkerman, Agnes; Torenvlied, René.

In: Relations industrielles = Industrial relations, Vol. 70, No. 2, 2015, p. 327-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Influence of External Information on Collective Bargaining: Survey Evidence of Union and Firm Negotiators in the Netherlands

AU - Lehr, Alex

AU - Akkerman, Agnes

AU - Torenvlied, René

N1 - Special issue: Le syndicalisme en quête d’autonomie et de renouvellement en Europe : Études de cas : Grèce, Espagne, Portugal et France / Unionism in Search of Autonomy and Renewal in Europe : Case Studies: Greece, Spain, Portugal and France

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper seeks to answer two questions: 1- To what extent are negotiators in collective bargaining influenced by different types of external information? 2- How can differences in the influence of external information between negotiators be explained by the characteristics of the negotiators and bargaining units? A standardized questionnaire measuring self-reported influences of different types of external information was developed and administered to a representative sample of union and firm negotiators in the Netherlands. In total, 123 negotiators participated in the survey. Four types of external information were investigated: 1- economic information; 2- information on organizational power; 3- institutional information; and 4- information spillovers. Descriptive analyses show that economic information, particularly when referring to the sector level, was very influential, as was institutional information on national and sectoral collective agreement developments. Information reflecting organizational power, e.g. militancy, carried less weight, while information on other bargaining events, i.e. spillover, was also very important. From extant theory, empirical findings and common assumptions in labour relations literature, the paper developed and tested a number of hypotheses concerning the influence of external information. It was found that the influence of spillovers increased with the proximity of their source. Union negotiators were generally more influenced by external information than firm negotiators. There was some evidence that influence increased with experience, but this effect was rather modest. Evidence that negotiators in sector bargaining were less affected by the economic environment than negotiators in company bargaining was weak, but they were found to be less influenced by spillovers and international collective agreement developments.

AB - This paper seeks to answer two questions: 1- To what extent are negotiators in collective bargaining influenced by different types of external information? 2- How can differences in the influence of external information between negotiators be explained by the characteristics of the negotiators and bargaining units? A standardized questionnaire measuring self-reported influences of different types of external information was developed and administered to a representative sample of union and firm negotiators in the Netherlands. In total, 123 negotiators participated in the survey. Four types of external information were investigated: 1- economic information; 2- information on organizational power; 3- institutional information; and 4- information spillovers. Descriptive analyses show that economic information, particularly when referring to the sector level, was very influential, as was institutional information on national and sectoral collective agreement developments. Information reflecting organizational power, e.g. militancy, carried less weight, while information on other bargaining events, i.e. spillover, was also very important. From extant theory, empirical findings and common assumptions in labour relations literature, the paper developed and tested a number of hypotheses concerning the influence of external information. It was found that the influence of spillovers increased with the proximity of their source. Union negotiators were generally more influenced by external information than firm negotiators. There was some evidence that influence increased with experience, but this effect was rather modest. Evidence that negotiators in sector bargaining were less affected by the economic environment than negotiators in company bargaining was weak, but they were found to be less influenced by spillovers and international collective agreement developments.

KW - METIS-315846

KW - IR-99430

U2 - 10.7202/1031488ar

DO - 10.7202/1031488ar

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 327

EP - 352

JO - Relations industrielles = Industrial relations

JF - Relations industrielles = Industrial relations

SN - 0034-379X

IS - 2

ER -