The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context

Siswa A.N. van Riesen (Corresponding Author), Hannie Gijlers, Anjo Anjewierden, Ton de Jong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Designing and conducting sound and informative experiments is an important aspect of inquiry learning. Students, however, often design experiments that do not allow them to reach conclusions. Considering the difficulties students experience with the process of designing experiments, additional guidance in the form of an Experiment Design Tool (EDT) was developed, together with reflection questions. In this study, 147 pre-university students worked in an online inquiry learning environment on buoyancy and Archimedes’ principle. Students were randomly assigned to one of three conditions, each of which contained a different version of the EDT. Since students’ prior knowledge has been found to influence the amount and type of guidance they need, the versions of the tool differed with respect to the level of guidance provided. A pre- and post-test were administered to assess students’ conceptual knowledge. No overall differences between conditions were found. In a subsequent analysis, students were classified as either low, low-intermediate-, high-intermediate, or high prior knowledge students. For Archimedes’ principle we found that low-intermediate prior knowledge students gained significantly more conceptual knowledge than low prior knowledge students in the fully guided condition. It is hypothesised that students need at least some prior knowledge in order to fully benefit from the guidance offered.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1327-1344
Number of pages18
JournalInternational journal of science education
Volume40
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 May 2018

Keywords

  • UT-Hybrid-D
  • Experiment design
  • Secondary education
  • Guidance
  • Prior knowledge
  • Inquiry learning environment

Cite this

@article{b4aa6b2740c748108b67d54d0e8076a3,
title = "The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context",
abstract = "Designing and conducting sound and informative experiments is an important aspect of inquiry learning. Students, however, often design experiments that do not allow them to reach conclusions. Considering the difficulties students experience with the process of designing experiments, additional guidance in the form of an Experiment Design Tool (EDT) was developed, together with reflection questions. In this study, 147 pre-university students worked in an online inquiry learning environment on buoyancy and Archimedes’ principle. Students were randomly assigned to one of three conditions, each of which contained a different version of the EDT. Since students’ prior knowledge has been found to influence the amount and type of guidance they need, the versions of the tool differed with respect to the level of guidance provided. A pre- and post-test were administered to assess students’ conceptual knowledge. No overall differences between conditions were found. In a subsequent analysis, students were classified as either low, low-intermediate-, high-intermediate, or high prior knowledge students. For Archimedes’ principle we found that low-intermediate prior knowledge students gained significantly more conceptual knowledge than low prior knowledge students in the fully guided condition. It is hypothesised that students need at least some prior knowledge in order to fully benefit from the guidance offered.",
keywords = "UT-Hybrid-D, Experiment design, Secondary education, Guidance, Prior knowledge, Inquiry learning environment",
author = "{van Riesen}, {Siswa A.N.} and Hannie Gijlers and Anjo Anjewierden and {de Jong}, Ton",
note = "Taylor & Francis deal",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "1327--1344",
journal = "International journal of science education",
issn = "0950-0693",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "11",

}

The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. / van Riesen, Siswa A.N. (Corresponding Author); Gijlers, Hannie; Anjewierden, Anjo; de Jong, Ton.

In: International journal of science education, Vol. 40, No. 11, 29.05.2018, p. 1327-1344.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context

AU - van Riesen, Siswa A.N.

AU - Gijlers, Hannie

AU - Anjewierden, Anjo

AU - de Jong, Ton

N1 - Taylor & Francis deal

PY - 2018/5/29

Y1 - 2018/5/29

N2 - Designing and conducting sound and informative experiments is an important aspect of inquiry learning. Students, however, often design experiments that do not allow them to reach conclusions. Considering the difficulties students experience with the process of designing experiments, additional guidance in the form of an Experiment Design Tool (EDT) was developed, together with reflection questions. In this study, 147 pre-university students worked in an online inquiry learning environment on buoyancy and Archimedes’ principle. Students were randomly assigned to one of three conditions, each of which contained a different version of the EDT. Since students’ prior knowledge has been found to influence the amount and type of guidance they need, the versions of the tool differed with respect to the level of guidance provided. A pre- and post-test were administered to assess students’ conceptual knowledge. No overall differences between conditions were found. In a subsequent analysis, students were classified as either low, low-intermediate-, high-intermediate, or high prior knowledge students. For Archimedes’ principle we found that low-intermediate prior knowledge students gained significantly more conceptual knowledge than low prior knowledge students in the fully guided condition. It is hypothesised that students need at least some prior knowledge in order to fully benefit from the guidance offered.

AB - Designing and conducting sound and informative experiments is an important aspect of inquiry learning. Students, however, often design experiments that do not allow them to reach conclusions. Considering the difficulties students experience with the process of designing experiments, additional guidance in the form of an Experiment Design Tool (EDT) was developed, together with reflection questions. In this study, 147 pre-university students worked in an online inquiry learning environment on buoyancy and Archimedes’ principle. Students were randomly assigned to one of three conditions, each of which contained a different version of the EDT. Since students’ prior knowledge has been found to influence the amount and type of guidance they need, the versions of the tool differed with respect to the level of guidance provided. A pre- and post-test were administered to assess students’ conceptual knowledge. No overall differences between conditions were found. In a subsequent analysis, students were classified as either low, low-intermediate-, high-intermediate, or high prior knowledge students. For Archimedes’ principle we found that low-intermediate prior knowledge students gained significantly more conceptual knowledge than low prior knowledge students in the fully guided condition. It is hypothesised that students need at least some prior knowledge in order to fully benefit from the guidance offered.

KW - UT-Hybrid-D

KW - Experiment design

KW - Secondary education

KW - Guidance

KW - Prior knowledge

KW - Inquiry learning environment

U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263

DO - 10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 1327

EP - 1344

JO - International journal of science education

JF - International journal of science education

SN - 0950-0693

IS - 11

ER -